Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934	
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006
OR
 
¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934	
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number: 001-14129
Commission File Number: 333-103873
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.
STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY
(Exact name of registrants as specified in its charters)

Delaware	 	06-1437793	
Delaware	 	75-3094991	
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	 	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)	
 
2187 Atlantic Street, Stamford, Connecticut    06902
(Address of principal executive office)
(203) 328-7310
(Registrants’ telephone number, including area code)
 
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No   ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, or non-accelerated filers. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer  ¨                    Accelerated filer  x                    Non-accelerated filer  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x
At May 2, 2006, the registrants had units and shares of each issuer’s classes of common stock outstanding as follows:

Star Gas Partners, L.P.  	  	Common Units	  	75,774,336	
Star Gas Partners, L.P.  	  	General Partner Units	  	325,729	
Star Gas Finance Company	  	Common Shares	  	100	

Table of Contents
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

 	 	 	 	 	  	Page	
Part I	 	Financial Information	  	 	
 	 	 	
 	 	Item 1—Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	  	 	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2005 and March 31, 2006	  	3	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006	  	4	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006	  	5	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Partners’ Capital for the six months ended March 31, 2006	  	6	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006	  	7	
 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	  	8-20	
 	 	 	
 	 	Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	  	21-42	
 	 	 	
 	 	Item 3—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	  	43	
 	 	 	
 	 	Item 4—Controls and Procedures	  	43	
 	 	 	
Part II	 	Other Information:	  	 	
 	 	 	
 	 	Item 1—Legal Proceedings	  	44	
 	 	 	
 	 	Item 1A—Risk Factors	  	45-53	
 	 	 	
 	 	Item 6—Exhibits	  	54	
 	 	 	
 	 	Signatures	  	55	
 
2

Table of Contents
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)	  	Sept. 30,
2005	 	 	March 31,
2006	 	
ASSETS	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Current assets	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents	  	$	99,148	 	 	$	9,198	 	
Receivables, net of allowances of $5,622 and $8,859, respectively	  	 	89,703	 	 	 	211,988	 	
Inventories	  	 	52,461	 	 	 	43,776	 	
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	  	 	70,120	 	 	 	47,058	 	
Current assets held for sale	  	 	—  	 	 	 	2,023	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total current assets	  	 	311,432	 	 	 	314,043	 	

Property and equipment, net	  	 	50,022	 	 	 	44,605	 	
Long-term portion of accounts receivables	  	 	3,788	 	 	 	3,999	 	
Goodwill	  	 	166,522	 	 	 	166,522	 	
Intangibles, net	  	 	82,345	 	 	 	68,323	 	
Deferred charges and other assets, net	  	 	15,152	 	 	 	14,036	 	
Long-term assets held for sale	  	 	—  	 	 	 	5,630	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total assets	  	$	629,261	 	 	$	617,158	 	

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Current liabilities	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accounts payable	  	$	19,780	 	 	$	17,421	 	
Working capital facility borrowings	  	 	6,562	 	 	 	—  	 	
Current maturities of long-term debt	  	 	796	 	 	 	94	 	
Accrued expenses	  	 	56,580	 	 	 	63,626	 	
Unearned service contract revenue	  	 	36,602	 	 	 	36,500	 	
Customer credit balances	  	 	65,287	 	 	 	26,067	 	
Current liabilities associated with assets held for sale	  	 	—  	 	 	 	3,754	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total current liabilities	  	 	185,607	 	 	 	147,462	 	
 	 	 	
Long-term debt	  	 	267,417	 	 	 	267,215	 	
Other long-term liabilities	  	 	31,129	 	 	 	31,645	 	
 	 	 	
Partners’ capital (deficit)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Common unitholders	  	 	144,312	 	 	 	194,109	 	
Subordinated unitholders	  	 	(8,930	)	 	 	(3,145	)	
General partner	  	 	(3,936	)	 	 	(3,431	)	
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	  	 	13,662	 	 	 	(16,697	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total partners’ capital	  	 	145,108	 	 	 	170,836	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	  	$	629,261	 	 	$	617,158	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
3

Table of Contents
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per unit data)	  	Three Months Ended
March 31,	 	 	Six Months Ended
March 31,	 	
 	  	2005	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	 	2006	 	
Sales:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Product	  	$	510,869	 	 	$	495,797	 	 	$	807,988	 	 	$	854,666	 	
Installations and service	  	 	44,448	 	 	 	43,324	 	 	 	98,023	 	 	 	98,835	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total sales	  	 	555,317	 	 	 	539,121	 	 	 	906,011	 	 	 	953,501	 	
Cost and expenses:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cost of product	  	 	362,741	 	 	 	367,870	 	 	 	585,644	 	 	 	629,841	 	
Cost of installations and service	  	 	50,335	 	 	 	47,661	 	 	 	108,710	 	 	 	105,356	 	
Delivery and branch expenses	  	 	70,643	 	 	 	57,917	 	 	 	136,123	 	 	 	116,915	 	
Depreciation and amortization expenses	  	 	9,021	 	 	 	7,924	 	 	 	18,143	 	 	 	16,410	 	
General and administrative expenses	  	 	12,918	 	 	 	6,001	 	 	 	28,760	 	 	 	12,794	 	
Goodwill impairment loss	  	 	67,000	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	67,000	 	 	 	—  	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating income (loss)	  	 	(17,341	)	 	 	51,748	 	 	 	(38,369	)	 	 	72,185	 	
Interest expense	  	 	(9,071	)	 	 	(7,958	)	 	 	(19,946	)	 	 	(15,498	)	
Interest income	  	 	1,052	 	 	 	849	 	 	 	1,435	 	 	 	1,707	 	
Amortization of debt issuance costs	  	 	(590	)	 	 	(642	)	 	 	(1,305	)	 	 	(1,273	)	
Loss on redemption of debt	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	(42,082	)	 	 	—  	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	  	 	(25,950	)	 	 	43,997	 	 	 	(100,267	)	 	 	57,121	 	
Income tax expense	  	 	669	 	 	 	440	 	 	 	1,000	 	 	 	690	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations,	  	 	(26,619	)	 	 	43,557	 	 	 	(101,267	)	 	 	56,431	 	
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	(4,552	)	 	 	—  	 	
Gains on sale of discontinued operations, net of taxes	  	 	2,520	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	156,164	 	 	 	—  	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles	  	 	(24,099	)	 	 	43,557	 	 	 	50,345	 	 	 	56,431	 	
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles-change in inventory pricing method	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	(344	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income (loss)	  	$	(24,099	)	 	$	43,557	 	 	$	50,345	 	 	$	56,087	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
General Partner’s interest in net income (loss)	  	$	(218	)	 	$	392	 	 	$	454	 	 	$	505	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Limited Partners’ interest in net income (loss)	  	$	(23,881	)	 	$	43,165	 	 	$	49,891	 	 	$	55,582	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) per Limited Partner Unit:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	  	$	(0.74	)	 	$	1.20	 	 	$	(2.81	)	 	$	1.55	 	
Discontinued operations	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	(0.13	)	 	 	—  	 	
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	  	 	0.07	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	4.33	 	 	 	—  	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles	  	 	(0.67	)	 	 	1.20	 	 	 	1.39	 	 	 	1.55	 	
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles-change in inventory pricing method	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(0.01	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income (loss)	  	$	(0.67	)	 	$	1.20	 	 	$	1.39	 	 	$	1.54	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Weighted average number of Limited Partner units outstanding	  	 	35,783	 	 	 	35,903	 	 	 	35,770	 	 	 	35,903	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
4

Table of Contents
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands)	  	Three Months Ended
March 31,	  	Six Months Ended
March 31,	 	
 	  	2005	 	 	2006	  	2005	 	 	2006	 	
Net income (loss)	  	$	(24,099	)	 	$	43,557	  	$	50,345	 	 	$	56,087	 	
Other comprehensive income (loss):	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments	  	 	14,405	 	 	 	10,512	  	 	(9,024	)	 	 	(30,359	)	
Other comprehensive income (loss) from discontinued operations	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	  	 	(1,637	)	 	 	—  	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other comprehensive income (loss)	  	 	14,405	 	 	 	10,512	  	 	(10,661	)	 	 	(30,359	)	
 	 	 	 	 	
Comprehensive income (loss)	  	$	(9,694	)	 	$	54,069	  	$	39,684	 	 	$	25,728	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Reconciliation of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(in thousands)	  	Pension
Plan
Obligations	 	 	Derivative
Instruments	 	 	Total	 	
Balance as of September 30, 2004	  	$	(16,055	)	 	$	28,929	 	 	$	12,874	 	
Reclassification to earnings	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(20,709	)	 	 	(20,709	)	
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments	  	 	—  	 	 	 	11,685	 	 	 	11,685	 	
Other comprehensive income from discontinued operations	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(1,637	)	 	 	(1,637	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other comprehensive loss	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(10,661	)	 	 	(10,661	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of March 31, 2005	  	$	(16,055	)	 	$	18,268	 	 	$	2,213	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of September 30, 2005	  	$	(19,758	)	 	$	33,420	 	 	$	13,662	 	
Reclassification to earnings	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(14,884	)	 	 	(14,884	)	
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(15,475	)	 	 	(15,475	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other comprehensive loss	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(30,359	)	 	 	(30,359	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of March 31, 2006	  	$	(19,758	)	 	$	3,061	 	 	$	(16,697	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
5

Table of Contents
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

(in thousands, except per unit
amounts)	 	Units	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Common	 	Sr.
Sub.	 	Jr.
Sub.	 	General
Partner	 	Common	 	Senior
Sub.	 	 	Junior
Sub.	 	 	General
Partner	 	 	Accum. Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)	 	 	Partners’
Capital	 	 	
Balance as of September 30, 2005	 	32,166	 	3,392	 	345	 	326	 	$	144,312	 	$	(6,403	)	 	$	(2,527	)	 	$	(3,936	)	 	$	13,662	 	 	$	145,108	 	 	
Net income	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	49,797	 	 	5,251	 	 	 	534	 	 	 	505	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	56,087	 	 	
Other comprehensive loss, net	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(30,359	)	 	 	(30,359	)	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of March 31, 2006	 	32,166	 	3,392	 	345	 	326	 	$	194,109	 	$	(1,152	)	 	$	(1,993	)	 	$	(3,431	)	 	$	(16,697	)	 	$	170,836	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
6

Table of Contents
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

(in thousands)	  	Six Months Ended
March 31,	 	
 	  	2005	 	 	2006	 	
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income	  	$	50,345	 	 	$	56,087	 	
Deduct: Loss from discontinued operations	  	 	4,552	 	 	 	—  	 	
Deduct: Gain on sale of discontinued operations	  	 	(156,164	)	 	 	—  	 	
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Depreciation and amortization	  	 	18,143	 	 	 	16,410	 	
Amortization of debt issuance cost	  	 	1,305	 	 	 	1,273	 	
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	  	 	—  	 	 	 	344	 	
Unit compensation expense	  	 	(2,104	)	 	 	—  	 	
Provision for losses on accounts receivable	  	 	4,407	 	 	 	4,459	 	
(Gain) loss on sales of fixed assets, net	  	 	58	 	 	 	(451	)	
Loss on redemption of debt	  	 	42,082	 	 	 	—  	 	
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments, net	  	 	3,172	 	 	 	149	 	
Goodwill impairment loss	  	 	67,000	 	 	 	—  	 	
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Increase in receivables	  	 	(142,979	)	 	 	(127,177	)	
Decrease (increase) in inventories	  	 	(21,100	)	 	 	8,253	 	
Increase in other assets	  	 	(15,643	)	 	 	(1,996	)	
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable	  	 	724	 	 	 	(2,358	)	
Decrease in other current and long-term liabilities	  	 	(31,611	)	 	 	(31,343	)	
Increase in assets held for sale, net	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(3,900	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash used in operating activities	  	 	(177,813	)	 	 	(80,250	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Capital expenditures	  	 	(1,432	)	 	 	(3,091	)	
Cash proceeds from disposition of propane segment	  	 	467,190	 	 	 	—  	 	
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets	  	 	3,433	 	 	 	1,295	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	  	 	469,191	 	 	 	(1,796	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Working capital facility borrowings	  	 	292,200	 	 	 	46,336	 	
Working capital facility repayments	  	 	(167,055	)	 	 	(52,898	)	
Repayment of debt	  	 	(259,484	)	 	 	(748	)	
Debt repayment costs	  	 	(37,688	)	 	 	—  	 	
Increase in deferred charges	  	 	(7,701	)	 	 	(594	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash used in financing activities	  	 	(179,728	)	 	 	(7,904	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash flows of discontinued operations: (revised, see note 2)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating activities	  	 	(21,402	)	 	 	—  	 	
Investing activities	  	 	(664	)	 	 	—  	 	
Financing activities	  	 	10,700	 	 	 	—  	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash used in discontinued operations	  	 	(11,366	)	 	 	—  	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net increase (decrease) in cash	  	 	100,284	 	 	 	(89,950	)	
 	 	 	
Cash at beginning of period	  	 	4,692	 	 	 	99,148	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash at end of period	  	$	104,976	 	 	$	9,198	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
7

Table of Contents
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
1)	Partnership Organization	
Star Gas Partners, L.P. (“Star Gas Partners” or the “Partnership”) is a home heating oil distributor and services provider. Star Gas Partners is a master limited partnership, which at March 31, 2006 had outstanding 32.2 million common units (NYSE: “SGU” representing an 88.8% limited partner interest in Star Gas Partners) and 3.4 million senior subordinated units (NYSE: “SGH” representing a 9.4% limited partner interest in Star Gas Partners). Additional Partnership interests included 0.3 million junior subordinated units (representing a 0.9% limited partner interest) and a 0.3 million general partner units (representing a 0.9% general partner interest).
As of March 31, 2006 the Partnership was organized as follows:
 
 	•	 	The general partner of the Partnership was Star Gas LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Star Gas”). The Board of Directors of Star Gas was appointed by its members. The general partner’s interest owned by Star Gas represented approximately a 0.9% interest in the Partnership.	
 
 	•	 	The Partnership’s heating oil operations (the “heating oil segment”) are conducted through Petro Holdings, Inc. (“Petro”) and its subsidiaries. Petro is a Minnesota corporation that is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Star/Petro, Inc., which is a 99.99% subsidiary of the Partnership. The remaining .01% equity interest in Star/Petro, Inc., was owned by Star Gas. Petro is a retail distributor of home heating oil as of March 31, 2006 and serves approximately 450,000 customers in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions.	
 
 	•	 	Star Gas Finance Company is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership. Star Gas Finance Company serves as the co-issuer, jointly and severally with the Partnership, of the Partnership’s $265 million 10  1 / 4 % Senior Notes, which are due in 2013. The Partnership is dependent on distributions including intercompany interest payments from its subsidiaries to service the Partnership’s debt obligations. The distributions from the Partnership’s subsidiaries are not guaranteed and are subject to certain loan restrictions. Star Gas Finance Company has nominal assets and conducts no business operations.	
Effective as of April 28, 2006, the Partnership completed a strategic recapitalization pursuant to the terms of the unit purchase agreement dated as of December 5, 2005, as amended (the “unit purchase agreement”), by and among, the Partnership, Star Gas, Kestrel Energy Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Kestrel”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Kestrel Heat LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Kestrel Heat” or the “general partner”), and KM2, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“M2”). In connection with the recapitalization, Star Gas withdrew as the general partner of the Partnership and Kestrel Heat became the general partner of the Partnership. (See Note 12—Subsequent Events—Recapitalization).
Immediately following the closing of the recapitalization the Partnership had 75,774,336 common units outstanding, representing a 99.6% limited partner interest in the Partnership, 325,729 general partner units outstanding, representing a 0.4% general partner interest in the Partnership, and no subordinated or junior subordinated units outstanding.
The Partnership was formerly engaged in the retail distribution of propane and related supplies and equipment to residential and commercial customers in the Midwest and Northeast regions of the United States and Florida and Georgia (the “propane segment”). In December 2004, the Partnership completed the sale of all of its interests in the propane segment to Inergy Propane, LLC (“Inergy”) for a purchase price of $481.3 million. The Partnership recorded a gain on this sale of approximately $157 million.
 
8

Table of Contents
2)	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	
Basis of Presentation
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Star Gas Partners, and its subsidiaries. All material inter-company items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The financial information included herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair statement of financial condition and results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.
These interim financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2005.
The Partnership completed the sale of its propane segment on December 17, 2004. As a result of the sale of the propane segment, the Partnership has included the results of the propane segment as a component of discontinued operations for the six months ended March 31, 2005, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”
Revenue Recognition
Sales of heating oil and heating oil and air conditioning equipment are recognized at the time of delivery of the product to the customer or at the time of sale or installation. Revenue from repairs and maintenance service is recognized upon completion of the service. Payments received from customers for heating oil equipment service contracts are deferred and amortized into income over the terms of the respective service contract, on a straight-line basis, which generally do not exceed one year. To the extent that the Partnership anticipates that future costs for fulfilling its contractual obligations under its service maintenance contracts will exceed the amount of deferred revenue currently attributable to these contracts, the Partnership recognizes a loss in current period earnings equal to the amount that anticipated future costs exceed related deferred revenues.
Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Limited Partner Unit
Net income (loss) per limited partner unit is computed by dividing net income (loss), after deducting the general partner’s interest, by the weighted average number of common units, senior subordinated units and junior subordinated units outstanding. Each unit in each of the partnership’s ownership classes participates in net income (loss) equally.
Revised Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
The Partnership has separately disclosed the operating, investing and financing portions of the cash flows attributable to its discontinued operations, in accordance with SFAS No. 95, for the six month period ended March 31, 2005, which were previously reported on a combined basis as a single amount.
 
9

Table of Contents
Inventories
At September 30, 2005, the Partnership’s inventory of heating oil and other fuels were stated at the lower of cost or market computed on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Effective October 1, 2005, the Partnership changed from the FIFO method to the weighted average cost (WAC) method. All other inventories, representing parts and equipment have been and continue to be stated at the lower of cost or market using the FIFO method.

 	  	Sept. 30,
2005	  	March 31,
2006	
Heating oil and other fuels	  	$	39,858	  	$	31,834	
Fuel oil parts and equipment	  	 	12,603	  	 	11,942	
 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
 	  	$	52,461	  	$	43,776	
 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Property, plant and equipment, consists of the following (in thousands):

 	  	Sept. 30,
2005	  	March 31,
2006	
Property, plant and equipment	  	$	120,844	  	$	118,231	
Less: accumulated depreciation	  	 	70,822	  	 	73,626	
 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Property and equipment, net	  	$	50,022	  	$	44,605	
 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
The Partnership recorded $35.1 million and $3.3 million for the fair value of its derivative instruments to prepaid expenses and other current assets at September 30, 2005 and March 31, 2006, respectively.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Derivatives and Hedging
The Partnership uses derivative instruments to manage the majority of its exposure to market risk related to changes in the current and future market price of home heating oil purchased for resale to protected-price customers. It is the Partnership’s objective to hedge the cash flow variability associated with forecasted purchases of its inventory held for resale to protected price customers through the use of derivative instruments when appropriate. To a lesser extent, the Partnership may hedge the fair value of inventory on hand or firm commitments to purchase inventory. To meet these objectives, it is the Partnership’s policy to enter into various types of derivative instruments to (i) manage the variability of cash flows resulting from the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of home heating oil purchased for resale to protected-price customers, and (ii) hedge the downside price risk of firm purchase commitments and in some cases physical inventory on hand.
All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair market value. On the date the derivative contract is entered into, the Partnership designates the derivative as either a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (fair value hedge), or a hedge of a forecasted purchase or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge). The Partnership formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Partnership also formally assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of hedged items.
Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a fair value hedge, along with the loss or gain on the hedged asset or liability or unrecognized firm commitment of the hedged item that is attributable to the hedged risk are recorded in earnings. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, until earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the designated hedged item. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.
 
10

Table of Contents
When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Partnership discontinues hedge accounting prospectively. When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective hedge, the Partnership continues to carry the derivative on the balance sheet at its fair value, and recognizes changes in the fair value of the derivative through current-period earnings.
For each of the six-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, the change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is principally attributable to the decrease in fair value of existing cash flow hedges and the reclassification to earnings of accumulated gains on cash flow hedges that settled during the period.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 142 also requires intangible assets with definite useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”
 
3)	Change in Accounting Principle	
At September 30, 2005, the Partnership’s inventory of heating oil and other fuels were stated at the lower of cost or market computed on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Effective October 1, 2005, the Partnership changed from the FIFO method to the weighted average cost (WAC) method for its inventory of heating oil and other fuels. All other inventories, representing parts and equipment, have been and continue to be stated at the lower of cost or market using the FIFO method. The Partnership believes that the WAC methodology is preferable in the circumstances because it reflects a more accurate correlation between revenues and product costs experienced in the Partnerships business environment by normalizing the carrying cost of heating oil and other fuels given the increasing short-term volatility in the marketplace for these products. The cumulative effect of this change as of October 1, 2005 decreased net income by $0.3 million.
Pro forma amounts assuming the change in accounting principle is applied retroactively are:

In thousands except per share data	  	Three Months Ended
March 31,	  	Six Months Ended
March 31,	
 	  	2005	 	 	2006	  	2005	  	2006	
Net income (loss) as previously reported	  	$	(24,099	)	 	$	43,557	  	$	50,345	  	$	56,087	
Pro forma net income (loss)	  	$	(26,555	)	 	$	43,557	  	$	49,251	  	$	56,431	
General Partners interests in pro forma net income (loss)	  	$	(239	)	 	$	392	  	$	443	  	$	508	
Limited Partners interests in pro forma net income (loss)	  	$	(26,316	)	 	$	43,165	  	$	48,808	  	$	55,923	
Basic and fully diluted earnings per unit as previously reported	  	$	(0.67	)	 	$	1.20	  	$	1.39	  	$	1.54	
Pro forma basic and fully diluted earnings per unit	  	$	(0.74	)	 	$	1.20	  	$	1.36	  	$	1.55	
 
4)	Assets Held for Sale	
Prior to December 31, 2005, the Partnership received two separate offers to sell certain net assets of two separate heating oil locations in New England. The Partnership determined at that time that the assets being offered in these pending sales met the criteria as “Assets Held for Sale” in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” Accordingly, in contemplation of the future sale of these assets, the carrying value of the assets and liabilities were reclassified on the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. One of the pending sales was closed on January 18, 2006 and the
 
11

Table of Contents
Partnership recognized a gain of approximately $0.8 million. The remaining location is still on the market and the Partnership is actively seeking a suitable buyer. The Partnership cannot provide any assurance that these activities will ultimately lead to a sale. In the event that a suitable buyer cannot be found, the Partnership will reclassify these assets from assets held for sale and will resume normal depreciation and amortization of the assets. No impairment has been recorded in connection with the contemplated sale, as it is anticipated that proceeds from any future sales will exceed the net book value of the assets sold. The net book value of the net assets anticipated to be sold is approximately $3.9 million.
 
5)	Long-term Debt	
On November 3, 2005, the Partnership’s revolving credit facility was amended to increase the facility size by $50 million, from $260 million to $310 million, for the peak winter months from December through March of each year. Obligations under the revolving credit facility are secured by liens on substantially all of the assets of the Partnership, the heating oil segment and its subsidiaries.
The revolving credit facility provides the Partnership with the ability to borrow up to $260 million ($310 million during the peak winter months) for working capital purposes (subject to certain borrowing base limitations and coverage ratios), including the issuance of up to $75 million in letters of credit. The facility expires in December 2009. In December 2004, this facility replaced the former credit facilities entered into in December 2003, which totaled $235 million. The former credit facilities consisted of a working capital facility, a letter of credit facility, and an acquisition facility. The Partnership borrowed an initial $119 million under the new revolving credit facility on December 17, 2004, which it used to repay amounts outstanding under the heating oil segment’s former credit facilities. The Partnership recognized a loss of approximately $3 million in the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as a result of the early redemption of this debt. The Partnership had no outstanding borrowings under this facility at March 31, 2006.
On February 3, 2006, the Partnership signed an amendment (the “Amendment”) to its revolving credit facility agreement that became effective as of April 28, 2006, upon the closing of the unit purchase agreement. (See Note 12—Subsequent Events—Recapitalization).
The principal changes to the Credit Agreement included in the Amendment are as follows:
 
 	•	 	The definition of “Change of Control” was amended to replace the term “Sevin Group” with the term “Kestrel Group” and to define “Kestrel Group” to include Kestrel Energy Partners LLC and any officers, directors or employees of the general partner owning interests in the general partner.	
 
 	•	 	The dividend covenant was amended to permit the payment of a dividend of $38 million as necessary to purchase senior notes, including accrued interest, and to pay expenses in connection with the transactions contemplated by the unit purchase agreement and by the individual agreements between the Partnership and certain holders of senior notes dated as of December 5, 2005.	
 
 	•	 	The definition of “Permitted Acquisitions,” which requires as a condition to making an acquisition, among other things, $40 million of availability (plus unexpended proceeds from the sale of the Partnership’s propane segment) during a 12-month look back period, was amended to eliminate the need to increase availability by the unexpended amounts from the sale of the Partnership’s propane segment, while including in the calculation of availability such unexpended proceeds as were invested in the Partnership.	
As of March 31, 2006 the Partnership had $265 million in 10 1/4% senior notes, due 2013 outstanding, (the “existing notes”). On April 28, 2006 in connection with a recapitalization of the Partnership, (see Note 12), the Partnership (i) repurchased $65.3 million of existing notes, (ii) converted $26.9 million in face amount of existing notes into 13.4 million common units at a conversion price of $2.00 per unit and (iii) exchanged $165.3 million in principal amount of existing notes for a like amount of new 10  1 / 4 % senior notes due 2013 (the “new notes”) that were issued under an indenture dated as of April 28, 2006 (the “new indenture”.)
 
12

Table of Contents
The terms of the new indenture are substantially the same as the terms of the indenture under which the existing notes were issued (the “existing indenture”), except that the new indenture permits restricted payments of $22 million and allows the Partnership to make acquisitions of up to $60 million without passing certain financial tests. In addition, the new indenture provides that proceeds of asset sales may not be invested in current assets for purposes of the “asset sale” covenant. The repurchase, conversion and exchange of the existing notes in connection with the recapitalization has resolved any claims of the participating noteholders resulting from the sale of the Partnership’s propane business in December 2004, including the Partnership’s use of such proceeds to purchase working capital inventory and Star Gas Partners’ determination that “excess proceeds” (as defined in the existing indenture) did not include any amounts invested in such inventory and the granting of liens or collateral to the lenders pursuant to the credit facility. The existing notes conversion price was $2.00 per unit while the closing price of the Partnership’s units on April 27, 2006 was $2.40 per unit. As such, the Partnership expects to book a loss on the conversion of the existing debt in its third fiscal quarter totaling approximately $5.4 million. The Partnership also entered into an amended and restated indenture (the “amended indenture”) for $7.6 million in face amount of existing notes that remain outstanding that removed the following restrictive covenants from the existing indenture:
 
 	•	 	the limitation on restricted payments;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on dividends and other payment restrictions affecting restricted subsidiaries;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on indebtedness;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on transactions with affiliates;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on liens;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on the sale of assets;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on sale and leaseback transactions;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on other lines of business; and	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on co-issuers.	
The closing of the recapitalization was deemed to be a “change of control” under the existing indenture for the remaining $7.6 million in face amount of existing notes that were not repurchased, converted into common units or exchanged for new notes in connection with the recapitalization. Consequently, the Partnership is required to make an offer to repurchase such existing notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of their face value.
 
6)	Discontinued Operations	
In December 2004, the Partnership completed the sale of its propane segment to Inergy for a cash purchase price of $481.3 million and recognized a gain of approximately $157 million (net of income taxes of $1.3 million). $311 million of the proceeds from the sale were used to repurchase senior secured notes and first mortgage notes of the heating oil segment and propane segment, together with associated prepayment premiums, accrued interest and the amounts then outstanding under the propane segment’s working capital facility. The remainder of the proceeds were contributed to the heating oil segment (Petro Holdings, Inc.) as a capital contribution. In accordance with the purchase agreement, the effective date of the disposition was November 30, 2004. The historical results of the propane segment are reflected as discontinued operations in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements.
 
13

Table of Contents
The components of discontinued operations of the propane segment for the six-month period ended March 31, 2005 is as follows (in thousands):

Sales	  	$	58,722	 	
Cost of sales	  	 	38,442	 	
Delivery and branch	  	 	17,796	 	
Depreciation and amortization	  	 	3,481	 	
General and administrative expenses	  	 	2,096	 	
 	  	 	 	 	
Operating loss	  	 	(3,093	)	
Net interest expense	  	 	1,384	 	
Amortization of debt issuance costs	  	 	27	 	
 	  	 	 	 	
Loss before income taxes	  	 	(4,504	)	
Income tax expense	  	 	48	 	
 	  	 	 	 	
Net loss	  	$	(4,552	)	

7)	Segment Reporting	
As of March 31, 2006, the Partnership has one reportable operating segment: retail distribution of heating oil. The administrative expenses for Star Gas Partners, have not been allocated to the segment. The heating oil segment is engaged in the retail distribution of home heating oil, related equipment services and equipment sales to residential and commercial customers. It operates primarily in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states. Home heating oil is principally used by the Partnership’s residential and commercial customers to heat their homes and buildings, as a result, weather conditions have a significant impact on the demand for home heating oil.
The public master limited partnership includes the office of the Chief Executive Officer and has the responsibility for maintaining investor relations and investor reporting for the Partnership and providing strategic direction to the heating oil segment.
The following are the condensed statements of operations and balance sheets for the heating oil segment as of and for the periods indicated. There were no inter-segment sales.

(in thousands)	  	For the Three Months Ended March 31,	
 	  	2005	 	 	2006	
Statements of Operations	  	Heating
Oil	 	 	Partners
& Others	 	 	Consol.	 	 	Heating
Oil	  	Partners
& Others	 	 	Consol.	
Sales	  	$	555,317	 	 	$	—  	 	 	$	555,317	 	 	$	539,121	  	$	—  	 	 	$	539,121	
Cost of sales	  	 	413,076	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	413,076	 	 	 	415,531	  	 	—  	 	 	 	415,531	
Delivery and branch	  	 	70,643	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	70,643	 	 	 	57,917	  	 	—  	 	 	 	57,917	
Depreciation & amortization	  	 	9,021	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	9,021	 	 	 	7,924	  	 	—  	 	 	 	7,924	
General & administrative expenses	  	 	5,046	 	 	 	7,872	 	 	 	12,918	 	 	 	3,462	  	 	2,539	 	 	 	6,001	
Goodwill impairment loss	  	 	67,000	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	67,000	 	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating income (loss)	  	 	(9,469	)	 	 	(7,872	)	 	 	(17,341	)	 	 	54,287	  	 	(2,539	)	 	 	51,748	
Net interest expense	  	 	5,632	 	 	 	2,387	 	 	 	8,019	 	 	 	4,643	  	 	2,466	 	 	 	7,109	
Amortization of debt issuance costs	  	 	385	 	 	 	205	 	 	 	590	 	 	 	436	  	 	206	 	 	 	642	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	  	 	(15,486	)	 	 	(10,464	)	 	 	(25,950	)	 	 	49,208	  	 	(5,211	)	 	 	43,997	
Income tax expense	  	 	669	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	669	 	 	 	440	  	 	—  	 	 	 	440	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations	  	 	(16,155	)	 	 	(10,464	)	 	 	(26,619	)	 	 	48,768	  	 	(5,211	)	 	 	43,557	
Gains on sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes	  	 	761	 	 	 	1,759	 	 	 	2,520	 	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income (loss)	  	$	(15,394	)	 	$	(8,705	)	 	$	(24,099	)	 	$	48,768	  	$	(5,211	)	 	$	43,557	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Capital expenditures	  	$	626	 	 	$	—  	 	 	$	626	 	 	$	507	  	$	—  	 	 	$	507	

14

Table of Contents
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
(in thousands)	 	For the Six Months Ended March 31,	 	
 	 	2005	 	 	2006	 	
Statements of Operations	 	Heating
Oil	 	 	Partners
& Others	 	 	Consol.	 	 	Heating
Oil	 	 	Partners
& Others	 	 	Consol.	 	
Sales	 	$	906,011	 	 	$	—  	 	 	$	906,011	 	 	$	953,501	 	 	$	—  	 	 	$	953,501	 	
Cost of sales	 	 	694,354	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	694,354	 	 	 	735,197	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	735,197	 	
Delivery and branch	 	 	136,123	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	136,123	 	 	 	116,915	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	116,915	 	
Depreciation & amortization	 	 	18,143	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	18,143	 	 	 	16,410	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	16,410	 	
General & administrative expenses	 	 	11,902	 	 	 	16,858	 	 	 	28,760	 	 	 	6,879	 	 	 	5,915	 	 	 	12,794	 	
Goodwill impairment loss	 	 	67,000	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	67,000	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating income (loss)	 	 	(21,511	)	 	 	(16,858	)	 	 	(38,369	)	 	 	78,100	 	 	 	(5,915	)	 	 	72,185	 	
Net interest expense	 	 	13,503	 	 	 	5,008	 	 	 	18,511	 	 	 	8,858	 	 	 	4,933	 	 	 	13,791	 	
Amortization of debt issuance costs	 	 	894	 	 	 	411	 	 	 	1,305	 	 	 	862	 	 	 	411	 	 	 	1,273	 	
Loss on redemption of debt	 	 	24,192	 	 	 	17,890	 	 	 	42,082	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	 	 	(60,100	)	 	 	(40,167	)	 	 	(100,267	)	 	 	68,380	 	 	 	(11,259	)	 	 	57,121	 	
Income tax expense	 	 	1,000	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	1,000	 	 	 	690	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	690	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations	 	 	(61,100	)	 	 	(40,167	)	 	 	(101,267	)	 	 	67,690	 	 	 	(11,259	)	 	 	56,431	 	
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	 	 	—  	 	 	 	(4,552	)	 	 	(4,552	)	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	
Gains on sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes	 	 	761	 	 	 	155,403	 	 	 	156,164	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	 	 	(60,339	)	 	 	110,684	 	 	 	50,345	 	 	 	67,690	 	 	 	(11,259	)	 	 	56,431	 	
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle—change in inventory pricing method	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	(344	)	 	 	—  	 	 	 	(344	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income (loss)	 	$	(60,339	)	 	$	110,684	 	 	$	50,345	 	 	$	67,346	 	 	$	(11,259	)	 	$	56,087	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Capital expenditures	 	$	1,432	 	 	$	—  	 	 	$	1,432	 	 	$	3,091	 	 	$	—  	 	 	$	3,091	 	

15

Table of Contents
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
(in thousands)	 	September 30, 2005	 	March 31, 2006	
Balance Sheets	 	Heating
Oil	 	 	Partners &
Others (1)	 	 	Consol.	 	Heating
Oil	 	 	Partners &
Others (1)	 	 	Consol.	
ASSETS	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Current assets:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents	 	$	99,102	 	 	$	46	 	 	$	99,148	 	$	9,152	 	 	$	46	 	 	$	9,198	
Receivables, net	 	 	89,703	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	89,703	 	 	211,988	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	211,988	
Inventories	 	 	52,461	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	52,461	 	 	43,776	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	43,776	
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	 	 	67,908	 	 	 	2,212	 	 	 	70,120	 	 	42,260	 	 	 	4,798	 	 	 	47,058	
Current assets held for sale	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	2,023	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	2,023	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total current assets	 	 	309,174	 	 	 	2,258	 	 	 	311,432	 	 	309,199	 	 	 	4,844	 	 	 	314,043	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Property and equipment, net	 	 	50,022	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	50,022	 	 	44,605	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	44,605	
Long-term portion of accts. receivable	 	 	3,788	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	3,788	 	 	3,999	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	3,999	
Goodwill	 	 	166,522	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	166,522	 	 	166,522	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	166,522	
Intangibles, net	 	 	82,345	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	82,345	 	 	68,323	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	68,323	
Deferred charges & other assets, net	 	 	9,021	 	 	 	6,131	 	 	 	15,152	 	 	8,316	 	 	 	5,720	 	 	 	14,036	
Assets held for sale	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	5,630	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	5,630	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total assets	 	$	620,872	 	 	$	8,389	 	 	$	629,261	 	$	606,594	 	 	$	10,564	 	 	$	617,158	

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Current Liabilities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accounts payable	 	$	19,807	 	 	$	(27	)	 	$	19,780	 	$	17,449	 	 	$	(28	)	 	$	17,421	
Working capital facility borrowings	 	 	6,562	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	6,562	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	 	
Current maturities of long-term debt	 	 	796	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	796	 	 	94	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	94	
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	 	 	50,348	 	 	 	6,232	 	 	 	56,580	 	 	56,703	 	 	 	6,923	 	 	 	63,626	
Due to affiliates	 	 	(8,667	)	 	 	8,667	 	 	 	—  	 	 	(16,588	)	 	 	16,588	 	 	 	—  	
Unearned service contract revenue	 	 	36,602	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	36,602	 	 	36,500	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	36,500	
Customer credit balances	 	 	65,287	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	65,287	 	 	26,067	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	26,067	
Current liabilities associated with assets held for sale	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	3,754	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	3,754	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total current liabilities	 	 	170,735	 	 	 	14,872	 	 	 	185,607	 	 	123,979	 	 	 	23,483	 	 	 	147,462	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Long-term debt	 	 	95	 	 	 	267,322	 	 	 	267,417	 	 	50	 	 	 	267,165	 	 	 	267,215	
Due to affiliate	 	 	165,684	 	 	 	(165,684	)	 	 	—  	 	 	165,684	 	 	 	(165,684	)	 	 	—  	
Other long-term liabilities	 	 	27,377	 	 	 	3,752	 	 	 	31,129	 	 	28,003	 	 	 	3,642	 	 	 	31,645	
Partners’ capital:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Equity capital	 	 	256,981	 	 	 	(111,873	)	 	 	145,108	 	 	288,878	 	 	 	(118,042	)	 	 	170,836	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	 	$	620,872	 	 	$	8,389	 	 	$	629,261	 	$	606,594	 	 	$	10,564	 	 	$	617,158	

(1)	The Partner and Other amounts include the balance sheet of the public master limited partnership, Star Gas Finance Company, as well as the necessary consolidation entries to eliminate the investment in Petro Holdings.	
 
16

Table of Contents
8)	Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets	
Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill impairment is deemed to exist if the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. If goodwill of a reporting unit is determined to be impaired, the amount of impairment is measured based on the excess of the net book value of the goodwill over the implied fair value of the goodwill. The Partnership has one reporting unit, which is consistent with the operating segments identified in Note 7—Segment Reporting.
Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following (in thousands):

 	  	September 30, 2005	  	March 31, 2006	
 	  	Gross
Carrying
Amount	  	Accum.
Amortization	  	Net	  	Gross
Carrying
Amount	  	Accum.
Amortization	  	Net	
Customer lists	  	$	189,559	  	$	107,265	  	$	82,294	  	$	177,635	  	$	109,316	  	$	68,319	
Covenants not to compete	  	 	4,755	  	 	4,704	  	 	51	  	 	4,499	  	 	4,495	  	 	4	
 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
 	  	$	194,314	  	$	111,969	  	$	82,345	  	$	182,134	  	$	113,811	  	$	68,323	
 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $10.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005 compared to $10.2 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006. Total estimated annual amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and the four succeeding fiscal years ending September 30, is as follows (in thousands):

 	  	Estimated
Annual
Amortization
Expense	
2006	  	$	20,002	
2007	  	$	19,080	
2008	  	$	17,410	
2009	  	$	11,229	
2010	  	$	6,418	
 
9)	Employee Pension Plan	

 	  	Three Months Ended
March 31,	 	 	Six Months Ended
March 31,	 	
 	  	2005	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	 	2006	 	
Components of net periodic benefit cost	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Service cost	  	$	—  	 	 	$	—  	 	 	$	—  	 	 	$	—  	 	
Interest cost	  	 	875	 	 	 	843	 	 	 	1,751	 	 	 	1,686	 	
Expected return on plan assets	  	 	(1,020	)	 	 	(989	)	 	 	(2,040	)	 	 	(1,978	)	
Net amortization	  	 	359	 	 	 	404	 	 	 	718	 	 	 	808	 	
Effect of Settlement	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net periodic benefit cost	  	$	214	 	 	$	258	 	 	$	429	 	 	$	516	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
The heating oil segment expects to contribute approximately $0.1 million to its plans during fiscal 2006 to fund its pension obligations.
 
17

Table of Contents
10)	Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information	

(in thousands)	  	Six Months Ended
March 31,	 	
 	  	2005	 	 	2006	 	
Cash paid (received) during the period for:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income taxes, net	  	$	2,382	 	 	$	(303	)	
Interest, net	  	$	22,490	 	 	$	13,904	 	
Non-cash financing activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Decrease in long-term debt—amortization of debt discount	  	$	146	 	 	$	156	 	
Decrease in interest expense	  	$	(146	)	 	$	(156	)	
Increase in fixed assets	  	$	—  	 	 	$	874	 	
Increase in other current and long-term liabilities for capital leases	  	$	—  	 	 	$	(874	)	
 
11)	Earnings Per Limited Partner Unit	

(in thousands, except per unit data)	  	Three Months Ended
March 31,	  	Six Months Ended
March 31,	 	
 	  	2005	 	 	2006	  	2005	 	 	2006	 	
 	  	(in thousands, except per unit data)	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations per limited partner unit:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic and diluted	  	$	(0.74	)	 	$	1.20	  	$	(2.81	)	 	$	1.55	 	
Loss from discontinued operations, before gain on sale of propane segment, net of income taxes per limited partner unit:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic and diluted	  	$	—  	 	 	$	—  	  	$	(0.13	)	 	$	—  	 	
Gain on sale of propane segment, net of income taxes per limited partner unit:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic and diluted	  	$	0.07	 	 	$	—  	  	$	4.33	 	 	$	—  	 	
Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic and diluted	  	$	(0.67	)	 	$	1.20	  	$	1.39	 	 	$	1.55	 	
Cumulative effect on changes in accounting principles:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic and diluted	  	$	—  	 	 	$	—  	  	$	—  	 	 	$	(0.01	)	
Net income per limited partner unit:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic and diluted	  	$	(0.67	)	 	$	1.20	  	$	1.39	 	 	$	1.54	 	
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Limited Partner Unit:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income	  	$	(24,099	)	 	$	43,557	  	$	50,345	 	 	$	56,087	 	
Less: general partner’s interest in net income (loss)	  	$	(218	)	 	$	392	  	$	454	 	 	$	505	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
  Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss)	  	$	(23,881	)	 	$	43,165	  	$	49,891	 	 	$	55,582	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Common units	  	 	32,166	 	 	 	32,166	  	 	32,166	 	 	 	32,166	 	
Senior subordinated units	  	 	3,272	 	 	 	3,392	  	 	3,259	 	 	 	3,392	 	
Junior subordinated units	  	 	345	 	 	 	345	  	 	345	 	 	 	345	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding	  	 	35,783	 	 	 	35,903	  	 	35,770	 	 	 	35,903	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit	  	$	(0.67	)	 	$	1.20	  	$	1.39	 	 	$	1.54	 	

18

Table of Contents
12)	Subsequent Event—Recapitalization	
Effective as of April 28, 2006 the Partnership completed a recapitalization of the Partnership pursuant to the terms of the unit purchase agreement. In connection with the recapitalization:
 
 	•	 	The Partnership received an aggregate of $57.7 million in new equity financing (i) through the sale of an aggregate of 6,750,000 common units to Kestrel Heat and M2 at a purchase price of $2.50 per unit and (ii) pursuant to the sale of 19,687,500 common units in a rights offering to common unitholders at a subscription price of $2.00 per common unit ($2.25 per unit in the case of 5,972,523 units purchased by M2 pursuant to a standby commitment).	
 
 	•	 	The Partnership (i) repurchased $65.3 million in face amount of its existing notes, (ii) converted $26.9 million in face amount of existing notes into 13.4 million common units at a conversion price of $2.00 per unit and (iii) exchanged $165.2 million in principal amount of existing notes for a like amount of new notes that were issued under the new indenture . The terms of the new indenture are substantially the same as the terms of the existing indenture except that the new indenture permits restricted payments of $22 million and allows the Partnership to make acquisitions of up to $60 million without passing certain financial tests. In addition, the new indenture provides that proceeds of asset sales may not be invested in current assets for purposes of the “asset sale” covenant. The repurchase, conversion and exchange of the existing notes in connection with the recapitalization has resolved any claims of the participating noteholders resulting from the sale of the Partnership’s propane business in December 2004, including the Partnership’s use of such proceeds to purchase working capital inventory and the Partnership’s determination that “excess proceeds” (as defined in the existing indenture) did not include any amounts invested in such inventory and the granting of liens or collateral to the lenders pursuant to the credit facility.	
 
 	•	 	The Partnership also entered into the amended indenture for the $7.6 million in face amount of existing notes that remain outstanding that removed the following restrictive covenants from the existing indenture:	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on restricted payments;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on dividends and other payment restrictions affecting restricted subsidiaries;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on indebtedness;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on transactions with affiliates;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on liens;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on the sale of assets;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on sale and leaseback transactions;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on other lines of business; and	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on co-issuers.	
 
 	•	 	The Partnership entered into the amended partnership agreement pursuant to which, among other things:	
 
 	•	 	Star Gas withdrew as the general partner of the Partnership, and Kestrel Heat was appointed the general partner of the Partnership and received 325,729 general partner units in the Partnership;	
 
 	•	 	each outstanding senior subordinated unit and each junior subordinated unit was converted into one common unit, as a result of which the subordination period has ended;	
 
 	•	 	the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units was reduced from $0.575 per unit per quarter, or $2.30 per year, to $0.0 per unit through September 30, 2008. Beginning October 1, 2008, minimum quarterly distributions will start accruing at a rate of $0.0675 per quarter ($0.27 on an annual basis). If the Partnership elects to commence making distributions of available cash before October 1, 2008, minimum quarterly distributions will start accruing at that earlier date;	
 
19

Table of Contents
 	•	 	all previously accrued cumulative distribution arrearages, which aggregated $111.0 million at February 14, 2006, were eliminated;	
 
 	•	 	the target distribution levels for the incentive distribution rights were reduced so that, commencing with the quarter beginning October 1, 2008, or, if the Partnership elects to commence making distributions sooner, the quarter in which any distribution of available cash is made, the new general partner units in the aggregate will be entitled to receive 10% of the cash distributions in a quarter once each common unit and general partner unit has received $.0675 for that quarter, plus any arrearages on the common units from prior quarters, and 20% of the cash distributions in a quarter once each common unit and general partner unit has received $.1125 for that quarter, plus any arrearages on the common units from prior quarters;	
 
 	•	 	the Partnership is not required to distribute available cash through the quarter ending September 30, 2008.	
Restriction on Use of NOLs. The issuance of units in our recapitalization will likely result in an “ownership change” of our corporate subsidiary, Star/Petro, Inc. (“Star/Petro”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Tax Code”). As a result of this ownership change, Star/Petro would be materially restricted in its ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards to reduce its future taxable income. As of the last calendar tax year ended December 31, 2005, Star/Petro had a federal net operating loss carryforward of approximately $166.4 million. The net operating loss carryforwards (prior to an “ownership change”) will begin to expire in 2025 and are generally available to reduce future taxable income that would otherwise be subject to federal income taxes. As a result of the ownership change, Star/Petro will be restricted annually in its ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards to reduce its federal taxable income. We believe that the restriction may entirely eliminate Star/Petro’s ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards. The restriction on Star/Petro’s ability to use net operating loss carryforwards to reduce its federal tax liability will reduce the amount of cash Star/Petro has available to make distributions to us. Consequently, the restriction will reduce the amount of cash we have available to distribute to our unitholders.
The following table shows the amount of units before and after the April 28, 2006 recapitalization described above.

 	  	Before Recapitalization*	 	 	After Recapitalization**	 	
 	  	Number	  	Percentage	 	 	Number	  	Percentage	 	
Common Units	  	 	  	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	
Existing common units	  	32,165,528	  	88.8	%	 	32,165,528	  	42.3	%	
Issued to Kestrel entities	  	—  	  	—  	 	 	6,750,000	  	8.9	%	
Issued in rights offering (1)	  	—  	  	—  	 	 	19,687,500	  	25.9	%	
Issued to senior noteholders	  	—  	  	—  	 	 	13,433,962	  	17.6	%	
Issued to subordinated unitholders	  	—  	  	—  	 	 	3,737,346	  	4.9	%	
 	  	 	  	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	
Subtotal	  	32,165,528	  	88.8	%	 	75,774,336	  	99.6	%	
 	  	 	  	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	
Subordinated Units	  	 	  	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	
Senior subordinated units	  	3,391,982	  	9.4	%	 	—  	  	—  	 	
Junior subordinated units	  	345,364	  	0.9	%	 	—  	  	—  	 	
 	  	 	  	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	
Subtotal	  	3,737,346	  	10.3	%	 	—  	  	—  	 	
 	  	 	  	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	
General Partner Units	  	325,729	  	0.9	%	 	325,729	  	0.4	%	
 	  	 	  	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	
Total	  	36,228,603	  	100	%	 	76,100,065	  	100	%	

*	As of March 31, 2006	
**	As of April 28, 2006	
(1)	Includes 5,972,523 common units issued to Kestrel @ $2.25 per share, pursuant to its standby commitment. As part of the recapitalization a total of 12,722,523 common units were issued to Kestrel entities, representing approximately 16.7% of total units after the recapitalization.	
 
20

Table of Contents
Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Disclosure
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” which represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events that involve risks and uncertainties, including those associated with the effect of weather conditions on our financial performance, anticipated proceeds from weather insurance, sales of assets, the price and supply of home heating oil, the consumption patterns of our customers, our ability to obtain satisfactory gross profit margins, our ability to obtain new customers and retain existing customers, our ability to effect strategic acquisitions or redeploy assets, the impact of litigation, the ongoing impact of the business process redesign project at the heating oil segment and our ability to address issues related to that project, natural gas conversions, future union relations and the outcome of current and future union negotiations, the impact of future environmental, health, and safety regulations, customer credit worthiness, and marketing plans. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Report including, without limitation, the statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere herein are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct and actual results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those set forth under the heading Risk Factors. Without limiting the foregoing the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “seek,” “estimate” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations (“Cautionary Statements”) are disclosed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Partnership or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary Statements. Unless otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise after the date of this Quarterly Report.
Overview
The following is a discussion of the historical condition and results of operations of the Partnership and its subsidiaries, and should be read in conjunction with the historical Financial and Operating Data and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report. We completed the sale of our propane segment in December 2004 and the following discussion reflects the historical results for the propane segment as discontinued operations.
In analyzing our financial results, the following matters should be considered. Our fiscal year ends on September 30. All references to quarters and years respectively in this document are to fiscal quarters and years unless otherwise noted. The seasonal nature of our business results in the sale of approximately 30% of our volume of home heating oil in the first fiscal quarter (October through December) and 45% of our volume in the second fiscal quarter (January through March) of each year, the peak heating season, because heating oil is primarily used for space heating in residential and commercial buildings. We generally realize net income in both of these quarters and net losses during the quarters ending June and September. In addition, sales volume typically fluctuates from year to year in response to variations in weather, wholesale energy prices and other factors. Gross profit is not only affected by weather patterns but also by changes in customer mix. For example, sales to our residential variable customers ordinarily generate higher margins than sales to our other customer groups, such as residential protected price or commercial customers. In addition, our gross profit margins vary by geographic region. Accordingly, gross profit margins could vary significantly from year to year in a period of identical sales volumes.
The home heating oil segment’s customer base is comprised of three types of customers, residential variable, residential protected price and commercial/industrial. The selling price for a residential variable customer is established by our pricing committee from time to time based on market conditions and generally has
 
21

Table of Contents
the highest per gallon gross profit margin. A residential protected price heating oil customer enters into an agreement to purchase home heating oil at a fixed or maximum price per gallon over a 12-month period. Due to the greater price sensitivity of residential protected price customers, the per gallon margins realized from that customer segment generally are less than variable priced residential customers. Commercial/industrial customers are characterized as large volume users and contribute the lowest per gallon margin.
Summary of Significant Events and Developments
 
 	•	 	Recapitalization	
 
 	•	 	Home heating oil price volatility	
 
 	•	 	Customer attrition	
 
 	•	 	Warm weather	
 
 	•	 	Assets held for sale	
Recapitalization
Effective as of April 28, 2006 we completed a recapitalization of the Partnership pursuant to the terms of the unit purchase agreement. In connection with the recapitalization:
 
 	•	 	We received an aggregate of $57.7 million in new equity financing (i) through the sale of an aggregate of 6,750,000 common units to Kestrel Heat and M2 at a purchase price of $2.50 per unit and (ii) pursuant to the sale of 19,687,500 common units in a rights offering to common unitholders at a subscription price of $2.00 per common unit ($2.25 per unit in the case of units purchased by M2 pursuant to a standby commitment).	
 
 	•	 	We (i) repurchased $65.3 million in face amount of our existing notes”, (ii) converted $26.9 million in face amount of existing notes into 13.4 million common units at a conversion price of $2.00 per unit and (iii) exchanged $165.3 million in principal amount of existing notes for a like amount of new notes that were issued under the new indenture. The terms of the new indenture are substantially the same as the terms of the existing indenture except that the new indenture permits restricted payments of $22 million and allows the Partnership to make acquisitions of up to $60 million without passing certain financial tests. In addition, the new indenture provides that proceeds of asset sales may not be invested in current assets for purposes of the “asset sale” covenant. The repurchase, conversion and exchange of the existing notes in connection with the recapitalization has resolved any claims of the participating noteholders resulting from the sale of our propane business in December 2004, including the use of such proceeds to purchase working capital inventory and Star Gas Partners’ determination that “excess proceeds” (as defined in the existing indenture) did not include any amounts invested in such inventory and the granting of liens or collateral to the lenders pursuant to the credit facility.	
 
 	•	 	We also entered into an amended indenture for $7.6 million in face amount of existing notes that remain outstanding that removed the following restrictive covenants from the existing indenture:	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on restricted payments;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on dividends and other payment restrictions affecting restricted subsidiaries;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on indebtedness;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on transactions with affiliates;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on liens;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on the sale of assets;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on sale and leaseback transactions;	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on other lines of business; and	
 
 	•	 	the limitation on co-issuers.	
 
22

Table of Contents
 	•	 	We entered into an amended partnership agreement pursuant to which, among other things:	
 
 	•	 	Star Gas LLC withdrew as the general partner, and Kestrel Heat was appointed the new general partner and received 325,729 general partner units;	
 
 	•	 	each outstanding senior subordinated unit and each junior subordinated unit was converted into one common unit, as a result of which the subordination period has ended;	
 
 	•	 	the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units was reduced from $0.575 per unit per quarter, or $2.30 per year, to $0.0 per unit through September 30, 2008. Beginning October 1, 2008, minimum quarterly distributions will start accruing at a rate of $0.0675 per quarter ($0.27 on an annual basis). If we elect to commence making distributions of available cash before October 1, 2008, minimum quarterly distributions will start accruing at that earlier date;	
 
 	•	 	all previously accrued cumulative distribution arrearages, which aggregated $111.0 million at February 14, 2006, were eliminated;	
 
 	•	 	the target distribution levels for the incentive distribution rights were reduced so that, commencing with the quarter beginning October 1, 2008, or, if the Partnership elects to commence making distributions sooner, the quarter in which any distribution of available cash is made, the new general partner units in the aggregate will be entitled to receive 10% of the cash distributions in a quarter once each common unit and general partner unit has received $.0675 for that quarter, plus any arrearages on the common units from prior quarters, and 20% of the cash distributions in a quarter once each common unit and general partner unit has received $.1125 for that quarter, plus any arrearages on the common units from prior quarters;	
 
 	•	 	we are not required to distribute available cash through the quarter ending September 30, 2008	
Restriction on Use of NOLs. The issuance of units in our recapitalization will likely result in an “ownership change” of our corporate subsidiary, Star/Petro, Inc. (“Star/Petro”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Tax Code”). As a result of this ownership change, Star/Petro would be materially restricted in its ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards to reduce its future taxable income. As of the last calendar tax year ended December 31, 2005, Star/Petro had a federal net operating loss carryforward of approximately $166.4 million. The net operating loss carryforwards (prior to an “ownership change”) will begin to expire in 2025 and are generally available to reduce future taxable income that would otherwise be subject to federal income taxes. As a result of the ownership change, Star/Petro will be restricted annually in its ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards to reduce its federal taxable income. We believe that the restriction may entirely eliminate Star/Petro’s ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards. The restriction on Star/Petro’s ability to use net operating loss carryforwards to reduce its federal tax liability will reduce the amount of cash Star/Petro has available to make distributions to us. Consequently, the restriction will reduce the amount of cash we have available to distribute to our unitholders.
 
23

Table of Contents
Home Heating Oil Price Volatility
The wholesale price of heating oil, like any other market commodity, is generally set by the economic forces of supply and demand. Rapid global economic expansion is fueling an ever-increasing demand for oil. Home heating oil prices are closely linked to the price refiners pay for crude oil because crude oil is the principal cost component of home heating oil. Crude oil is bought and sold in the international marketplace and as such is subject to the economic forces of worldwide supply and demand. The United States imports more than 60% of the petroleum products it consumes. The average per-gallon wholesale cost of home heating oil as measured by the New York Mercantile Exchange (“Nymex”) for fiscal 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 by quarter is as follows:

Quarter Ended	  	Fiscal 2003	  	Fiscal 2004	  	Fiscal 2005	  	Fiscal 2006	 	
December 31	  	$	.7757	  	$	.8562	  	$	1.396	  	$	1.804	 	
March 31	  	 	.9620	  	 	.9351	  	 	1.408	  	 	1.753	 	
June 30	  	 	.7452	  	 	.9786	  	 	1.517	  	 	1.979	(a)	
September 30	  	 	.7858	  	 	1.182	  	 	1.835	  	 	—  	 	
 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Year Average	  	$	.8172	  	$	.9880	  	$	1.539	  	$	 	 	

(a)	For the month of April 2006 only. On April 28, 2006, the wholesale cost of home heating oil closed at $2.01 per gallon and represents an increase of over 57 cents per gallon from the close on April 29, 2005 of $1.44 per gallon.	
The market for petroleum products, including home heating oil, has been extremely volatile for the past several years. In a volatile market even small changes in supply or demand can dramatically affect prices. The changes we have seen this past year, and continue to experience have been significant. Heating oil prices are subject to price fluctuations if demand rises sharply because of excessively cold weather and/or disruptions at refineries and instability in key oil producing regions. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, over 75% of our revenue was attributable to the retail sale and delivery of home heating oil. About half of our retail sales of home heating oil are to customers who agree to pay a fixed or maximum price per gallon for each delivery over the next twelve months (protected price customers). The remaining retail sales are to customers who pay a variable price, based principally on the daily cost plus our profit margin.
We mitigate our exposure to our protected price customers by hedging our fixed and maximum price sales through the purchase of exchange traded options and futures and over the counter options and swaps, and we attempt to mitigate our exposure to variable priced customers, in most instances, by passing through higher home heating oil costs directly to such customers.
Customer attrition
Net customer attrition is the difference between gross customer losses and customers added through marketing efforts. Customers added through acquisitions are not included in the calculation of net customer attrition. The gain of a new customer does not fully compensate for the loss of an existing customer during the first year because of the expenses that must be incurred to acquire a new customer and the higher attrition rate associated with new customers. Gross customer losses are the result of a number of factors, including price competition, move-outs, and service issues. When a customer moves out of an existing home we count the “move-out” as a loss and if we are successful in signing up the new homeowner, the “move-in” is treated as a gain.
Gross customer gains and gross customer losses for fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005 is found below:

 	  	Fiscal Year Ended	 	
Description	  	2003	 	 	2004	 	 	2005	 	
Gross customer gains	  	71,800	 	 	67,400	 	 	63,800	 	
Gross customer losses	  	(78,800	)	 	(100,500	)	 	(98,900	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Customer Loss	  	(7,000	)	 	(33,100	)	 	(35,100	)	

24

Table of Contents
Net customer attrition as a percent of the home heating oil customer base for fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005 is found below:

 	  	Fiscal Year Ended	 	
Description	  	2003	 	 	2004	 	 	2005	 	
Gross customer gains	  	14.9	%	 	13.1	%	 	12.9	%	
Gross customer losses	  	(16.4	)%	 	(19.5	)%	 	(20.0	)%	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Customer Attrition	  	(1.5	)%	 	(6.4	)%	 	(7.1	)%	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net home heating oil customer accounts added (lost) for fiscal 2003, 2004, and 2005 by quarter is as follows:

Quarter Ended	  	Fiscal 2003	 	 	Fiscal 2004	 	 	Fiscal 2005	 	
December 31	  	3,500	 	 	(3,300	)	 	(2,000	)	
March 31	  	(3,700	)	 	(8,600	)	 	(9,900	)	
June 30	  	(5,900	)	 	(10,300	)	 	(7,400	)	
September 30	  	(900	)	 	(10,900	)	 	(15,800	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Customer Loss	  	(7,000	)	 	(33,100	)	 	(35,100	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
This increase in net customer attrition for fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005 can be attributed to: (i) a combination of the effect of our premium service/premium price strategy during a volatile period when customer price sensitivity increased due to high energy prices; (ii) our decision in the summer of fiscal 2005 to maintain reasonable profit margins going forward in spite of competitors’ aggressive pricing tactics; (iii) the lag effect of customer attrition related to service and delivery problems experienced in prior fiscal years; (iv) continued customer dissatisfaction with the centralization of customer care; and (v) tightened customer credit standards. If wholesale prices remain high, we believe the risk of customer losses due to credit problems, especially for commercial customers, may increase and bad debt expense would also increase.
For fiscal 2005, we lost approximately 35,100 accounts (net) or 2,000 more than the 33,100 accounts (net) lost in fiscal 2004. This increased loss of 2,000 accounts is largely due to the factors described above as well as losses of fixed price accounts that were renewed at a low fixed price in the summer and fall of 2004, as the heating oil segment, in an attempt to retain customers, did not raise prices sufficiently to offset the increase in the cost of home heating oil and which chose not to renew at higher prices in fiscal 2005. During the three months ended September 30, 2005, we lost 15,800 accounts (net) or 3.2% of our home heating oil customer base, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2004 in which we lost 10,900 accounts (net) or 2.1% of our home heating oil customer base. This increased loss of 4,900 accounts is largely due to losses attributable to accounts that were renewed at a low fixed price in the summer and fall of 2004 and that chose not to renew at higher prices in fiscal 2005. We cannot predict whether this trend will continue. Over the past several months, we have modified our marketing plan and are seeking to increase the home heating oil product margins realized on new accounts as well as on some of our less profitable accounts.
Prior to the fiscal 2004 winter heating season, we attempted to develop a competitive advantage in customer service through a business process redesign project and, as part of that effort, centralized our heating equipment service and oil dispatch functions and engaged a centralized customer care center to fulfill our telephone requirements for a majority of our home heating oil customers. We experienced difficulties in advancing this initiative during fiscal 2004, which adversely impacted the customer base and our costs. The savings from this initiative were less than expected and the costs to operate under the centralized format were greater than originally estimated.
We believe we have identified the problems associated with the past centralization efforts and continue to address these issues by structuring the customer call center into work groups that parallel Petro’s district structure, adding customer service specialists at the district level, providing continuous in-house training at the
 
25

Table of Contents
customer care center, and establishing a general manager of customer retention. In addition, we are answering all customer calls locally in five districts and are answering a portion of our customer calls in our other districts. Currently, approximately 30% of customer calls are being answered locally. We are continuing our initiative of moving toward decentralization of our operations to maximize contact at the local level, while continuing to assess the efficiency of certain centralized operations. The general manager of customer retention reports directly to the president and chief operating officer of the Partnership. Despite these efforts, we continued to experience high net attrition rates in fiscal 2005 and during the six months ended March 31, 2006, and we expect that high net attrition rates may continue through the balance of fiscal 2006 and perhaps beyond. Even to the extent that the rate of attrition can be reduced, the current reduced customer base will adversely impact net income in the future.
Customer Attrition—Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2006 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2005 and Twelve Months Ended March 31, 2006
Gross customer gains and gross customer losses for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 and the twelve months ended March 31, 2006 are found below:

 	  	Six Months Ended	 	 	Three Months Ended	 	 	Twelve Months Ended
03/31/06	 	
Description	  	03/31/06	 	 	03/31/05	 	 	03/31/06	 	 	03/31/05	 	 	 	 	
Gross customer gains	  	36,300	 	 	42,200	 	 	11,300	 	 	14,600	 	 	57,800	 	
Gross customer losses	  	(53,200	)	 	(54,100	)	 	(21,000	)	 	(24,500	)	 	(98,000	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Customer Loss	  	(16,900	)	 	(11,900	)	 	(9,700	)	 	(9,900	)	 	(40,200	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net customer attrition as a percent of the home heating oil customer base for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 and the twelve months ended March 31, 2006 are found below:

 	  	Six Months Ended	 	 	Three Months Ended	 	 	Twelve Months Ended
03/31/06	 	
Description	  	03/31/06	 	 	03/31/05	 	 	03/31/06	 	 	03/31/05	 	 	 	 	
Gross customer gains	  	8.1	%	 	8.5	%	 	2.5	%	 	2.9	%	 	12.2	%	
Gross customer losses	  	(11.8	)%	 	(11.0	)%	 	(4.7	)%	 	(5.0	)%	 	(20.7	)%	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Customer Attrition	  	(3.7	)%	 	(2.5	)%	 	(2.2	)%	 	(2.1	)%	 	(8.5	)%	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we lost 9,700 accounts (net) or 2.2% of our home heating oil customer base, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2005 in which we lost 9,900 accounts (net) or 2.1% of our home heating oil customer base. During the first quarter of fiscal 2006 we lost approximately 7,200 accounts (net) or 1.6% of our home heating oil customer base compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2005 in which we lost 2,000 accounts (net) or 0.4% of our home heating oil customer base. Continued customer losses can be attributed to: (i) a premium service/premium price strategy with the discipline to let unprofitable customers depart (ii) reduced customer focus on premium service due to moderate temperatures and reduced heating system stress and demand (iii) increased customer price sensitivity due to high energy prices; (iv) the lag effect of customer attrition and lost new customer referrals related to service and delivery problems experienced in prior fiscal years; (v) continued customer dissatisfaction with the centralization of customer care; and (vi) tightened customer credit standards.
During the six months ended March 31, 2006, we lost 16,900 accounts (net) or 3.7% of our home heating oil customer base, as compared to the six months ended March 31, 2005 in which we lost 11,900 accounts (net) or 2.5% of our home heating oil customer base. The principal change in performance was a reduction of 6,000 new customer gains and 1,000 less customer losses. The reduction in new customer gains can be attributed to: (i) higher minimum profitability standards for new customers in fiscal 2005; (ii) a reduction in mass market advertising spending, which attracted transient customers in fiscal 2004; (iii) increased customer price sensitivity due to high energy prices; and (iv) increased new customer credit quality standards.
 
26

Table of Contents
We cannot predict whether this trend will continue. Over the past several months, we have modified our marketing plan and are seeking to increase the home heating oil product margins realized on new accounts as well as on some of our less profitable accounts.
Our gross customer loss rate for the following twelve-month periods is found below:

Period	  	Loss Rate	 	
March 31, 2006	  	(21.0	)%	
December 31, 2005	  	(20.9	)%	
September 30, 2005	  	(20.0	)%	
June 30, 2005	  	(19.7	)%	
March 31, 2005	  	(20.3	)%	
September 30, 2004	  	(19.5	)%	
September 30, 2003	  	(16.4	)%	
For the month of April 2006, we lost 2,500 accounts (net) or 0.5% of our home heating oil customer base, as compared to the month of April 2005 in which we lost 2,000 accounts (net) or 0.4% of our home heating oil customer base. Both our gross customer loss rate and net customer attrition have increased since the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, or fiscal 2003. We do not know if the acceleration in our rate of gross customer losses and net customer attrition can be halted. Subsequent to March 31, 2006, home heating oil prices have increased to near record levels and spiked at $2.0788 per gallon on May 2, 2006. We believe that the continued volatility in home heating oil prices will adversely impact customer attrition.
Warm Weather
Weather conditions have a significant impact on the demand for home heating oil because our customers depend on this product principally for space heating purposes. As a result, weather conditions may materially adversely impact our operating results and financial condition. During the peak heating season of October through March, sales of home heating oil historically have represented approximately 75% to 80% of our annual home heating oil volume. Actual weather conditions can vary substantially from year to year, significantly affecting our financial performance. Furthermore, warmer than normal temperatures in one or more regions in which we operate can significantly decrease the total volume we sell and the gross profit realized on those sales, and, consequently, our operating results. We purchase weather insurance to help mitigate the adverse effect of weather volatility on our cash flows. Our current weather insurance in the amount of $12.5 million covers the period from November 1, 2006 to February 28, 2007, taken as a whole. The strike or “pay-off” price is based on the 10-year moving average of degree-days for the policy period and has been set at approximately 3% less than the 10-year moving average. For every degree-day not realized below the strike-price, we will receive $35,000 up to the policy maximum of $12.5 million. For the period from November 1, 2005 to February 28, 2006, we received $4.4 million under the weather insurance policy, which is recorded as a decrease in branch and operating expenses.
Assets held for sale
In the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, we received two separate offers to sell certain net assets of two separate heating oil locations in New England. No impairment has been recorded in connection with the contemplated sale, as it is anticipated that proceeds from the sale will exceed the net book value of the assets sold. These locations had approximately 29,000 customers and were responsible for delivering approximately 32 million gallons of home heating oil per year.
On January 18, 2006, we completed the sale of one heating oil location with approximately 3,900 customers and 4 million gallons. We recognized a gain of approximately $0.9 million on this sale. The Partnership has not come to terms for the sale of the other location with approximately 25,000 customers and 28 million gallons. The location is still on the market and we are actively seeking a suitable buyer and continue to discuss the sale of this location with other potential purchasers.
 
27

Table of Contents
The following is a discussion of the results of operations of the Partnership and its subsidiaries, and should be read in conjunction with the historical Financial and Operating Data and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. We completed the sale of the propane segment in December 2004. The following discussion reflects the historical results for the propane segment as discontinued operations.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
Statements of Operations by Segment

(in thousands)	 	Three Months Ended March 31,	
 	 	2005	 	 	2006	
Statements of Operations	 	Heating
Oil	 	 	Partners &
Others	 	 	Consol.	 	 	Heating
Oil	 	Partners &
Others	 	 	Consol.	
Sales:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Product	 	$	510,869	 	 	$	—  	 	 	$	510,869	 	 	$	495,797	 	$	—  	 	 	$	495,797	
Installations and service	 	 	44,448	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	44,448	 	 	 	43,324	 	 	—  	 	 	 	43,324	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total sales	 	 	555,317	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	555,317	 	 	 	539,121	 	 	 	 	 	 	539,121	
Cost and expenses:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cost of product	 	 	362,741	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	362,741	 	 	 	367,870	 	 	—  	 	 	 	367,868	
Cost of installations and service	 	 	50,335	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	50,335	 	 	 	47,661	 	 	—  	 	 	 	47,663	
Delivery and branch expenses	 	 	70,643	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	70,643	 	 	 	57,917	 	 	—  	 	 	 	57,917	
Depreciation & amortization expenses	 	 	9,021	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	9,021	 	 	 	7,924	 	 	—  	 	 	 	7,924	
General and administrative expenses	 	 	5,046	 	 	 	7,872	 	 	 	12,918	 	 	 	3,462	 	 	2,539	 	 	 	6,001	
Goodwill impairment charge	 	 	67,000	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	67,000	 	 	 	—  	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating income (loss)	 	 	(9,469	)	 	 	(7,872	)	 	 	(17,341	)	 	 	54,287	 	 	(2,539	)	 	 	51,748	
Interest expense—net	 	 	5,632	 	 	 	2,387	 	 	 	8,019	 	 	 	4,643	 	 	2,466	 	 	 	7,109	
Amortization of debt issuance costs	 	 	385	 	 	 	205	 	 	 	590	 	 	 	436	 	 	206	 	 	 	642	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	 	 	(15,486	)	 	 	(10,464	)	 	 	(25,950	)	 	 	49,208	 	 	(5,211	)	 	 	43,997	
Income tax expense	 	 	669	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	669	 	 	 	440	 	 	—  	 	 	 	440	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations	 	 	(16,155	)	 	 	(10,464	)	 	 	(26,619	)	 	 	48,768	 	 	(5,211	)	 	 	43,557	
Gains on sale of discounted operations net of income taxes	 	 	761	 	 	 	1,759	 	 	 	2,520	 	 	 	—  	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income (loss)	 	$	(15,394	)	 	$	(8,705	)	 	$	(24,099	)	 	$	48,768	 	$	(5,211	)	 	$	43,557	

28

Table of Contents
Volume
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, retail volume of home heating oil declined by 62.5 million gallons, or 25.5%, to 182.5 million gallons, as compared to 245.0 million gallons for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Volume of other petroleum products declined by 5.5 million gallons, or 22.0%, to 19.5 million gallons for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to 25.0 million gallons for the three months ended March 31, 2005. An analysis of the change in the retail volume of home heating oil, which is based on management’s estimates, sampling and other mathematical calculations, is found below:

(in millions of gallons)	  	Heating Oil
Segment	 	
Volume—Three Months Ended March 31, 2005	  	245.0	 	
Impact of warmer temperatures	  	(39.9	)	
Net customer attrition	  	(20.8	)	
Asset sale	  	(1.0	)	
Other, net	  	(0.8	)	
 	  	 	 	
Change	  	(62.5	)	
 	  	 	 	
Volume—Three Months Ended March 31, 2006	  	182.5	 	
 	  	 	 	
We believe that this 62.5 million gallon home heating oil decline was due to net customer attrition, which occurred in fiscal 2005 and continued through fiscal 2006, the impact of warmer temperatures and continued customer conservation efforts. Net customer attrition is the difference between gross customer losses and customers added through internal marketing efforts. Customers added through acquisitions do not impact the calculation of net customer attrition. For both fiscal 2005 and the twelve months ended March 31, 2006, the heating oil segment experienced net customer attrition of approximately 7.1% and 8.5%, respectively. (See discussion of customer attrition in the beginning of this section.) Temperatures (measured on a degree day basis) in our geographic areas of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 were approximately 16.2% warmer than the three months ended March 31, 2005 and approximately 13.3% warmer than normal, as reported by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”). Due to the significant increase in the price per gallon of home heating oil, we believe that customers are using less home heating oil given similar temperatures when compared to prior periods. Indications based on internal studies suggest that in fiscal 2005 customers reduced their consumption by approximately 4.4%. To a certain extent, we believe that our customers in fiscal 2006 have increased their conservation efforts. We cannot determine if conservation is a permanent or temporary phenomenon. We believe that the volume delivered during the three months ended March 31, 2006 was positively impacted by approximately 4 to 5 million gallons due to delivery scheduling as certain deliveries that would have normally been scheduled for the fiscal third quarter were made in March 2006. In addition, home heating oil volume declined by approximately 1.0 million gallons due to the sale of certain assets in New England.
For April 2006, retail volume of home heating oil declined by 8.5 million gallons, or 27.2% to 22.7 million gallons, as compared to 31.2 million gallons for April 2005 due to the warmer weather, net customer attrition, conservation and delivery scheduling. We expect that home heating oil volume sold for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2006 and for the balance of fiscal 2006 will be substantially less than in the comparable periods in fiscal 2005 due to warmer weather, net customer attrition, conservation and other factors such as delivery scheduling.
Product Sales
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, product sales declined $15.1 million, or 3.0%, to $495.8 million, as compared to $510.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 due to a decrease in home heating oil volume, which more than offset an increase in home heating oil selling prices. Selling prices were higher in response to the increase in wholesale supply costs noted below of $0.4894 per gallon and our decision to achieve higher per gallon gross profit margins, especially from our price-protected customers. Average home heating oil prices increased by $0.5824 per gallon, or 30.3%, from $1.9252 per gallon for the three months ended March 31, 2005 to $2.5076 for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
 
29

Table of Contents
Installation and Service Sales
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, service and installation sales decreased $1.1 million, or 2.5%, to $43.3 million, as compared to $44.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 due to the decline in the number of customers. The decline in service and installation revenue was less than the percentage decline in the customer base (8.5%) due to measures taken over the last several years to increase billing rates for service contracts and billable service.
Cost of Product
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, cost of product increased $5.1 million, or 1.4%, to $367.9 million, as compared to $362.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as the impact of higher wholesale product cost was reduced by 25.5% lower home heating oil volume. Average wholesale product cost for home heating oil increased by $0.4894 per gallon, or 36.5%, to an average of $1.8290 per gallon for the three months ended March 31, 2006, from an average of $1.3396 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Home heating oil per gallon margins for the three months ended March 31, 2006 increased by 9.3 cents per gallon, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2005 due to an increase in the margin realized on variable priced customers, an increase in the margin realized on price protected customers, an increase in the percentage of volume sold to higher margin residential variable customers, an increase in the home heating oil margins realized on new accounts, the loss of some of our less profitable accounts and our decision in the summer of fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006 to maintain reasonable profit margins going forward in spite of competitors’ aggressive pricing tactics. During the heavy renewal period for price-protected customers in fiscal 2004, which was a period of rising heating oil prices, a number of residential variable consumers migrated to price protection plans. This shift resulted in an increase in volume sold to residential price protected customers for the heating season of fiscal 2005. During the renewal period for price protected customers in fiscal 2005, a period with even higher average heating oil prices than the renewal period in fiscal 2004, a number of residential price protected customers elected variable pricing or failed to respond to our price protected programs, which resulted in a shift back to variable pricing. The percentage of home heating oil volume sold to residential variable price customers increased to 45.5% of total home heating oil volume sales for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to 36.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Accordingly, the percentage of home heating oil volume sold to residential price protected customers decreased to 39.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to 48.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2005. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, sales to commercial/industrial customers represented 15.4% of total home heating oil volume sales, compared to 14.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, product gross profit decreased by $20.2 million, or 13.6%, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2005, as the decline in home heating oil volume (25.5%) more than offset the impact of higher home heating oil per gallon margins.
Cost of Installations and Service
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, costs of installations, service and appliances decreased $2.7 million, or 5.3%, to $47.7 million, as compared to $50.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The decrease in cost of installation and service (5.3%) was less than the 8.5% decrease in customers for the twelve months ended March 31, 2006 due to the fixed nature of certain of these expenses. The net loss realized from service (including installations) was reduced by $1.6 million, from a $5.9 million loss for the three months ended March 31, 2005 to a $4.3 million loss for the three months ended March 31, 2006. When measured on a per gallon of home heating oil sold, the loss from service was 2.4 cents per gallon for the three months ended March 31, 2006, unchanged from the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Delivery and Branch Expenses
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, delivery and branch expenses decreased $12.7 million, or 18.0%, to $57.9 million, as compared to $70.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. This decrease
 
30

Table of Contents
was due to lower marketing expenses of $1.7 million, an estimated $7.1 million decrease in certain variable operating expenses directly associated with the 25.5% decline in home heating oil volume and $4.4 million received under our weather insurance policy. On a cents per gallon basis, delivery and branch expenses (excluding the proceeds received from weather insurance) increased 5.3 cents per gallon, or 18.4%, from 28.8 cents per gallon for the three months ended March 31, 2005 to 34.1 cents per gallon for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as the heating oil segment could not fully reduce its operating expenses in conjunction with the decline in volume attributable to the warmer temperatures and customer attrition due to the fixed nature of certain expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, depreciation and amortization expenses declined by $1.1 million, or 12.2%, to $7.9 million, as compared to $9.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as certain assets, that were not replaced, became fully depreciated.
General and Administrative Expenses
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, general and administrative expenses decreased by $6.9 million, or 53.5%, to $6.0 million, as compared to $12.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. At the Partnership level, general and administrative expenses decreased by $5.3 million, from $7.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2005, to $2.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2006. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Partnership incurred certain expenses, which were not repeated in the three months ended March 31, 2006, such as professional expenses of $1.1 million relating to first-year compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley, legal expenses of $1.6 million incurred relating to defending several purported class action suits and inquiries from regulatory agencies, and compensation expense of $3.1 million resulting from a separation agreement entered into with the former CEO of the Partnership. At the heating oil segment, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.6 million, or 31.4%, to $3.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, from $5.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, due to lower professional expenses of $0.1 million, staff reductions of $0.5 million and a gain of $0.8 million on the sale of certain assets which occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2006, and reduced general and administrative expenses.
Goodwill Impairment Charge
During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, a number of events occurred that indicated a possible impairment of goodwill might exist. These events included; our determination in February 2005 of significantly lower than expected operating results for the heating oil segment for the year and a significant decline in the Partnership’s unit price. As a result of these triggering events and circumstances, the Partnership completed an additional SFAS No. 142 impairment review with the assistance of a third party valuation firm at February 28, 2005. This review resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of approximately $67.0 million, which reduced the carrying amount of goodwill of the heating oil segment. There was no goodwill impairment charge recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 2006.
Operating Income (Loss)
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, operating income increased $69.1 million to $51.7 million, as compared to an operating loss of $17.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 due principally to the $67.0 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Interest expense
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, interest expense decreased $1.1 million, or 12.3%, to $8.0 million, as compared to $9.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. This decline resulted from a lower principal amount in total debt outstanding of approximately $117.0 million, which was offset in part by an increase in the Partnership’s weighted average interest rate from 8.4% during the three months ended March 31, 2005, to 9.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
 
31

Table of Contents
Interest Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, interest income decreased by $0.2 million, or 19.4%, to $0.8 million, as compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 due to lower average invested cash balances.
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, amortization of debt issuance costs were $0.6 million, unchanged from the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was $0.4 million and represents certain state income and capital taxes. Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $0.7 million.
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, income from continuing operations increased $70.2 million to $43.6 million, as compared to a loss of $26.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. This increase was primarily due to the $69.1 million increase in operating income.
Gains on Sale of Segments
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Partnership recorded additional gains on the sale of segments. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the purchase price resulting from the sale of the TG&E segment was finalized and a positive adjustment of $0.7 million was recorded. During the three months ended December 31, 2004, the Partnership recorded a gain of $153.6 million from the sale of the propane segment, which was subject to adjustment. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the purchase price for the sale of the propane segment was finalized and a positive adjustment to the gain of $1.8 million was recorded which brings the total gain from the sale of the propane segment to $155.4 million. There were no additional gains on the sale of segments recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 2006.
Net Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, net income increased by $67.7 million, to $43.6 million, as compared to a $24.1 million net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2005, due to the $70.2 million increase in income from continuing operations, partially offset by gains on the sale of segments of $2.5 million recorded at March 31, 2005.
 
32

Table of Contents
Six Months Ended March 31, 2006
Compared to Six Months Ended March 31, 2005
Statements of Operations by Segment

(in thousands)	 	Six Months Ended March 31,	 	
 	 	2005	 	 	2006	 	
Statements of Operations	 	Heating
Oil	 	 	Partners &
Others	 	 	Consol.	 	 	Heating
Oil	 	 	Partners &
Others	 	 	Consol.	 	
Sales:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Product	 	$	807,988	 	 	 	—  	 	 	$	807,988	 	 	$	854,666	 	 	 	—  	 	 	$	854,666	 	
Installations and service	 	 	98,023	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	98,023	 	 	 	98,835	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	98,835	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total sales	 	 	906,011	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	906,011	 	 	 	953,501	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	953,501	 	
Cost and expenses:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cost of product	 	 	585,644	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	585,644	 	 	 	629,841	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	629,841	 	
Cost of installations and service	 	 	108,710	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	108,710	 	 	 	105,356	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	105,356	 	
Delivery and branch expenses	 	 	136,123	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	136,123	 	 	 	116,915	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	116,915	 	
Depreciation & amortization expenses	 	 	18,143	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	18,143	 	 	 	16,410	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	16,410	 	
General and administrative expenses	 	 	11,902	 	 	$	16,858	 	 	 	28,760	 	 	 	6,879	 	 	$	5,915	 	 	 	12,794	 	
Goodwill impairment charge	 	 	67,000	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	67,000	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating income (loss)	 	 	(21,511	)	 	 	(16,858	)	 	 	(38,369	)	 	 	78,100	 	 	 	(5,915	)	 	 	72,185	 	
Interest expense—net	 	 	13,503	 	 	 	5,008	 	 	 	18,511	 	 	 	8,858	 	 	 	4,933	 	 	 	13,791	 	
Amortization of debt issuance costs	 	 	894	 	 	 	411	 	 	 	1,305	 	 	 	862	 	 	 	411	 	 	 	1,273	 	
Loss on redemption of debt	 	 	24,192	 	 	 	17,890	 	 	 	42,082	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	 	 	(60,100	)	 	 	(40,167	)	 	 	(100,267	)	 	 	68,380	 	 	 	(11,259	)	 	 	57,121	 	
Income tax expense	 	 	1,000	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	1,000	 	 	 	690	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	690	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations	 	 	(61,100	)	 	 	(40,167	)	 	 	(101,267	)	 	 	67,690	 	 	 	(11,259	)	 	 	56,431	 	
Loss from discontinued operations before gains on sale of segments, net of income taxes	 	 	—  	 	 	 	(4,552	)	 	 	(4,552	)	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	
Gains on sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes	 	 	761	 	 	 	155,403	 	 	 	156,164	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	(344	)	 	 	—  	 	 	 	(344	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income (loss)	 	$	(60,339	)	 	$	110,684	 	 	$	50,345	 	 	$	67,346	 	 	$	(11,259	)	 	$	56,087	 	

33

Table of Contents
Volume
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, retail volume of home heating oil declined by 73.5 million gallons, or 19.0%, to 313.8 million gallons, as compared to 387.3 million gallons for the six months ended March 31, 2005. Volume of other petroleum products declined by 8.0 million gallons, or 17.6%, to 37.1 million gallons for the six months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to 45.1 million gallons for the six months ended March 31, 2005. An analysis of the change in the retail volume of home heating oil, which is based on management’s estimates, sampling and other mathematical calculations, is found below:

(in millions of gallons)	  	Heating Oil
Segment	 	
Volume—Six Months Ended March 31, 2005	  	387.3	 	
Impact of warmer temperatures	  	(39.9	)	
Net customer attrition	  	(32.9	)	
Asset sale	  	(1.0	)	
Other, net	  	0.3	 	
 	  	 	 	
Change	  	(73.5	)	
 	  	 	 	
Volume—Six Months Ended March 31, 2006	  	313.8	 	
 	  	 	 	
We believe that this 73.5 million gallon home heating oil decline was due primarily to net customer attrition, which occurred in fiscal 2005 and continued through fiscal 2006, the impact of warmer temperatures and continued customer conservation efforts. Net customer attrition is the difference between gross customer losses and customers added through internal marketing efforts. Customers added through acquisitions do not impact the calculation of net customer attrition. For fiscal 2005 and the twelve months ended March 31, 2006, the heating oil segment experienced net customer attrition of approximately 7.1% and 8.5%, respectively. (See discussion of customer attrition in the beginning of this section.) Temperatures in our geographic areas of operations for the six months ended March 31, 2006 were 10.2% warmer than the six months ended March 31, 2005 and approximately 9.0% warmer than normal, as reported by the NOAA. Due to the significant increase in the price per gallon of home heating oil, we believe that customers are using less home heating oil given similar temperatures when compared to prior periods. Indications based on internal studies suggest that in fiscal 2005 customers reduced their consumption by approximately 4.4%. To a certain extent, we believe that our customers have increased their conservation efforts in fiscal 2006. We cannot determine if conservation is a permanent or temporary phenomenon.
We believe that 4 to 5 million gallons due to delivery scheduling positively impacted the volume delivered during the six months ended March 31, 2006. In addition, home heating oil volume declined by 1.0 million gallons due to the sale of certain of our assets in New England. We expect that home heating oil volume for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 and for the balance of fiscal 2006 will be substantially less than the comparable period in fiscal 2005 due to warmer weather, net customer attrition, conservation and other factors such as delivery scheduling.
Product Sales
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, product sales increased $46.7 million, or 5.8%, to $854.7 million, as compared to $808.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005 due to an increase in selling prices, which more than offset a decline in home heating oil volume sold. Selling prices were higher in response to the increase in wholesale supply costs noted below of $0.4463 per gallon and our decision to achieve higher per gallon gross profit margins, especially from our price protected customers. Average home heating oil prices increased by $0.5845 per gallon from $1.9045 per gallon for the six months ended March 31, 2005 to $2.489 for the six months ended March 31, 2006. In an effort to reduce net customer attrition, we delayed increasing our selling price to
 
34

Table of Contents
customers whose price plan agreements expired during the July to September 2004 time period. This decision negatively impacted product sales by an estimated $1.7 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005.
Installation and Service Sales
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, service and installation sales increased $0.8 million, or 0.8%, to $98.8 million, as compared to $98.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005. Service and installation revenue increased slightly in fiscal 2006 due to measures taken in the last several years to increase service billing and service contract rates.
Cost of Product
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, cost of product increased $44.2 million, or 7.5%, to $629.8 million, as compared to $585.6 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005, as the impact of higher wholesale product cost was reduced by lower home heating oil volume of 19.0%. Average wholesale product cost for home heating oil increased by $0.4463 per gallon, or 33.0%, to an average of $1.7975 per gallon for the six months ended March 31, 2006, from an average of $1.3511 for the six months ended March 31, 2005.
Home heating oil per gallon margins for the six months ended March 31, 2006 increased by 13.9 cents per gallon, as compared to the six months ended March 31, 2005 due largely to an increase in the margin realized on price protected customers, an increase in the percentage of volume sold to higher margin residential variable customers, an increase on the home heating oil margins realized on new accounts, the loss of some of our less profitable accounts and our decision in the summer of fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006 to maintain reasonable profit margins going forward in spite of competitors’ aggressive pricing tactics. During the renewal period for price-protected customers in fiscal 2004, which was a period of rising heating oil prices, a number of residential variable consumers migrated to price protection plans. This shift resulted in an increase in volume sold to residential price protected customers for the heating season of fiscal 2005. During the renewal period for price protected customers in fiscal 2005, a period with even higher average heating oil prices than the renewal period in fiscal 2004, a number of residential price protected customers elected variable pricing or failed to respond to our price protected programs, which resulted in a shift back to variable pricing. The percentage of home heating oil volume sold to residential variable price customers increased to 45.5% of total home heating oil volume sales for the six months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to 35.6% for the six months ended March 31, 2005. Accordingly, the percentage of home heating oil volume sold to residential price protected customers decreased to 38.7% for the six months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to 49.0% for the six months ended March 31, 2005. For the six months ended March 31, 2006, sales to commercial/industrial customers represented 15.7% of total home heating oil volume sales, as compared to 15.4% for the six months ended March 31, 2005.
Also contributing to the increase in home heating oil per gallon margins was the favorable market conditions experienced during the first quarter of fiscal 2006, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2005. During the three months ended December 31, 2004, home heating oil prices spiked by over 20 cents a gallon from the beginning of the period and contributed to margin compression experienced during the three months ended December 31, 2004. Conversely, during the three months ended December 31, 2005, home heating oil prices declined by over 30 cents from the beginning of the period, which contributed to the expansion of home heating oil margins during this period. During the summer of 2005, we experienced record wholesale prices for home heating oil due to the numerous hurricanes in Florida and the Gulf Coast. Subsequently, during the three months ended December 31, 2005, we were able to lag our variable selling prices as the wholesale cost of heating oil declined.
In addition, the six month comparison was favorably impacted by $2.9 million due to a delay in hedging the price of product for certain residential protected price customers during the six months ended March 31, 2005, as well as an additional $0.8 million associated with not hedging until December 2004 the price of product for certain residential price protected customers that were incorrectly coded as variable customers.
 
35

Table of Contents
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, product gross profit increased by $2.5 million, as compared to the six months ended March 31, 2005, as the decline in home heating oil volume was more than offset by higher home heating oil per gallon margins.
Cost of Installations and Service
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, cost of installations, service and appliances decreased $3.4 million, or 3.1%, to $105.4 million, as compared to $108.7 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005. The 3.1% decrease in cost of installation and service was less than the 8.5% decrease in customers for the twelve months ended March 31, 2006 due to the fixed nature of these expenses. The net loss realized from service (including installations) improved by $4.2 million, from a $10.7 million loss for the six months ended March 31, 2005 to a $6.5 million loss for the six months ended March 31, 2006. When measured on a per gallon of home heating oil sold basis, the loss from service improved by 0.7 cents per gallon, from 2.8 cents per gallon for the six months ended March 31, 2005 to 2.1 cents for the six months ended March 31, 2006.
Delivery and Branch Expenses
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, delivery and branch expenses decreased $19.2 million, or 14.1%, to $116.9 million, as compared to $136.1 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005. This decrease was due to lower marketing expenses of $5.5 million, an estimated $9.4 million decrease in certain variable operating expenses directly associated with the 19.0% decline in home heating oil volume and $4.4 million received under our weather insurance policy which reduced operating expenses. On a cents per gallon basis (excluding the proceeds received from weather insurance), delivery and branch expenses increased 3.5 cents per gallon, or 10.0%, from 35.2 cents per gallon for the six months ended March 31, 2005 to 38.7 cents per gallon for the six months ended March 31, 2006.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, depreciation and amortization expenses declined by $1.7 million, or 9.6%, to $16.4 million, as compared to $18.1 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005 as certain assets, which were not replaced, became fully depreciated.
General and Administrative Expenses
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, general and administrative expenses decreased by $16.0 million, or 55.5%, to $12.8 million, as compared to $28.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005. At the Partnership level, general and administrative expenses decreased by $11.0 million, from $16.9 million in the six months ended March 31, 2005, to $5.9 million in the six months ended March 31, 2006 due to the absence of bridge financing expenses of $7.5 which was incurred in the six months ended March 31, 2005 that were not incurred during the six months ended March 31, 2006, lower compensation expense attributable to staff reductions of $0.9 million, lower legal expenses of $2.8 million related to defending several purported class action lawsuits, lower first year Sarbanes-Oxley compliance cost of $1.6 million and $3.1 million in lower compensation expense related to a separation agreement recorded in the prior period with the former CEO. Offsetting these reductions was higher compensation expense of $2.1 million associated with unit appreciation rights, an increase in directors and officers liability insurance expense of $1.2 million and $1.3 million of legal and professional expenses relating to the Kestrel/recapitalization transaction. (In the six months ended March 31, 2005, the decline in the unit price for senior subordinated units resulted in reversing previously recorded expenses of $2.1 million.) At the heating oil segment, general and administrative expenses decreased by $5.0 million, or 42.2%, to $6.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006, from $11.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005 due to staff reductions of $ 0.9 million and lower fees and expenses totaling $3.4 million associated with certain amendments and waivers on our previous bank credit facility obtained during the first fiscal quarter of 2005, and a gain on the sale of certain assets for the six months ended March 31, 2006 of $0.4 million.
 
36

Table of Contents
Goodwill Impairment Charge
During the second fiscal quarter of 2005, a number of events occurred that indicated a possible impairment of goodwill might exist. These events included our determination in February 2005 of significantly lower than expected operating results for the heating oil segment for the year and a significant decline in the Partnership’s unit price. As a result of these triggering events and circumstances, the Partnership completed an additional SFAS 142 impairment review with the assistance of a third party valuation firm at February 28, 2005. This review resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of approximately $67.0 million, which reduced the carrying amount of goodwill of the heating oil segment. There was no goodwill impairment charge recorded during the six months ended March 31, 2006.
Operating Income (Loss)
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, operating income increased $110.6 million to $72.2 million, as compared to an operating loss of $38.4 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005. This increase was due to an increase in product gross profit margin of $2.5 million, improvements in net service and installation profitability of $4.2 million, lower delivery, branch and general and administrative expenses of $35.2 million, lower depreciation and amortization of $1.7 million, the non reoccurrence during the six months ended March 31, 2006, of a $67.0 million goodwill impairment charge recorded in the six months ended March 31, 2005.
Loss on Redemption of Debt
For the six months ended March 31, 2005, we recorded a $42.1 million loss on the early redemption of certain notes at the heating oil and propane segments in connection with the sale of the propane segment. The loss consists of cash premiums paid of $37.0 million for early redemption, the write-off of previously capitalized net deferred financing costs of $6.1 million and legal expenses of $0.7 million, reduced in part by a $1.7 million basis adjustment to the carrying value of long-term debt.
Interest expense
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, interest expense decreased $4.4 million, or 22.3%, to $15.5 million, as compared to $19.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005. This decrease resulted from a lower principal amount in total debt outstanding of approximately $154.8 million, which was offset in part by an increase in the Partnership’s weighted average interest rate from 8.6% during the six months ended March 31, 2005, to 10.0% for the six months ended March 31, 2006. On December 17, 2004, we sold the propane segment for $481.3 million. $311 million of the net proceeds was used to repurchase $182 million of senior secured notes, including accrued interest and prepayment premiums at the heating oil segment, $114 million of first mortgage notes including interest and prepayment premiums of the propane segment and $15.0 million was used to repay the outstanding balance and accrued interest of the propane segment’s working capital facility. The impact of the repayment of the propane segment’s debt instruments is reflected in discontinued operations. Working capital interest expense was also lower as a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the propane segment was used to fund working capital.
Interest Income
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, interest income increased by $0.3 million, or 19.0%, to $1.7 million, as compared to $1.4 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005.
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, amortization of debt issuance costs was $1.3 million, unchanged from the six months ended March 31, 2005.
 
37

Table of Contents
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense for the six months ended March 31, 2006 was $0.7 million and represents certain state income and capital taxes. Income tax expense for the six months ended March 31, 2005 was $1.0 million.
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, income (loss) from continuing operations increased $157.7 million to $56.4 million, as compared to a loss of $101.3 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005. This increase was due to the $110.6 million increase in operating income, lower interest expense of $4.4 million, and higher interest income of $0.3 million. The six-month comparison was also favorably impacted by the $42.1 million loss on redemption of debt recorded in the six months ended March 31, 2005.
Income From Discontinued Operations
For the six months ended March 31, 2005 the discontinued propane segment, which was sold on December 17, 2004, generated a $4.6 million loss.
Gains On Sale of Segments
During the six months ended March 31, 2005, the purchase price for the TG&E segment was finalized and a positive adjustment of $0.7 million was recorded. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the purchase price for the sale of the propane segment was finalized which resulted in an adjustment to the gain of $1.8 million and brings the total gain for the sale of the propane segment to $155.4 million. There were no additional gains on the sale of segments recorded during the six months ended March 31, 2006.
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
Effective October 1, 2005, we changed our method of accounting from the first-in, first-out method to the weighted average cost method for heating oil and other fuels. This change resulted in recording a charge of $0.3 million.
Net Income
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, net income increased by $5.7 million, to $56.1 million, as compared to $50.3 million in net income for the six months ended March 31, 2005, as an $157.4 million increase in income from continuing operations and a $4.6 million decline in the loss from discontinued operations in the 2006 first fiscal quarter was offset by the gains on the sale of discontinued operations recorded in the year ago period of $156.2 million.
Earnings From Continuing Operations Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, EBITDA increased $150.9 million, to $88.6 million, as compared to an EBITDA loss of $62.3 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005. This increase was due to an increase in home heating oil gross profit of $2.5 million, an improvement in net service loss of $4.2 million, lower bridge and financing expenses of $10.9 million, a reduction in marketing expenses of $5.5 million, lower operating expenses of $9.4 million due to the reduction in home heating oil volume delivered, lower compensation expense of $3.1 million relating to the separation agreement recorded during the six months ended March 31, 2005 and $4.4 million in weather insurance proceeds. The six-month comparison was also favorably impacted by the non-reoccurrence during the six months ended March 31, 2006 of a $42.1 million loss on the redemption of debt and a $67.0 million goodwill impairment charge recorded in the six months ended March 31, 2005. EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as an indicator of operating
 
38

Table of Contents
performance) or as an alternative to cash flow (as a measure of liquidity or ability to service debt obligations), but provides additional information for evaluating our ability to make the Minimum Quarterly Distribution. EBITDA is calculated for the six months ended March 31 as follows:

(in thousands)	  	Six Months Ended March 31,	 	
 	  	2005	 	 	2006	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations	  	$	(101,267	)	 	$	56,431	 	
Plus:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income tax expense	  	 	1,000	 	 	 	690	 	
Amortization of debt issuance costs	  	 	1,305	 	 	 	1,273	 	
Interest expense, net	  	 	18,511	 	 	 	13,791	 	
Depreciation and amortization	  	 	18,143	 	 	 	16,410	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
EBITDA	  	 	(62,308	)(a)	 	 	88,595	 	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Add/(subtract)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income tax expense	  	 	(1,000	)	 	 	(690	)	
Interest expense, net	  	 	(18,511	)	 	 	(13,791	)	
Unit compensation expense	  	 	(2,104	)	 	 	—  	 	
Provision for losses on accounts receivable	  	 	4,407	 	 	 	4,459	 	
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments	  	 	3,172	 	 	 	149	 	
Loss on redemption of debt	  	 	42,082	 	 	 	—  	 	
(Gain) loss on sales of fixed assets, net	  	 	58	 	 	 	(451	)	
Goodwill impairment loss	  	 	67,000	 	 	 	—  	 	
Change in operating assets and liabilities	  	 	(210,609	)	 	 	(158,521	)	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash used in operating activities	  	$	(177,813	)	 	$	(80,250	)	

(a)	Includes one-time expenses of $42.1 million related to early debt redemption.	
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our ability to satisfy our obligations depends on our future performance, which will be subject to prevailing economic, financial, business and weather conditions, the ability to pass on the full impact of high wholesale heating oil prices to customers, the effects of high net customer attrition, conservation and other factors, most of which are beyond our control. See “Risk Factors.” Capital requirements, at least in the near term, are expected to be provided by cash flows from operating activities, cash on hand at March 31, 2006 or a combination thereof. To the extent future capital requirements exceed cash flows from operating activities, we anticipate that working capital will be financed by our revolving credit facility as discussed below and repaid from subsequent seasonal reductions in inventory and accounts receivable. See “Recapitalization.”
Operating Activities
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, net cash used in operating activities was $80.3 million, or $97.5 million lower than net cash used in operating activities of $177.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005 due largely to an increase in operating income of $43.6 million (before the non cash goodwill impairment charge of $67.0 million recorded in March 2005), and lower cash requirements to finance accounts receivable and inventory of $15.8 million and $29.4 million, respectively. During the six months ended March 31, 2006, the increase in accounts receivable was $128.6 million (which includes accounts receivable included in assets held for sale), or $14.3 million less than the comparable increase in accounts receivable at March 31, 2005 of $143.0 million, due principally to a decline in total sales for the three months ended March 31, 2006 of $16.2 million. Despite an increase in home heating oil average selling prices of 30.3%, days sales outstanding for accounts receivable decreased from 37 days at March 31, 2005 to 36 days at March 31, 2006. Generally, accounts receivable collections were favorably impacted by warmer temperatures, which mitigated the impact of the
 
39

Table of Contents
increase in selling prices. The decrease in inventory for the six months ended March 31, 2006 was $8.3 million or $29.4 million less than the increase for the six months ended March 31, 2005 of $21.1 million, as we reduced our quantity of home heating oil on hand at March 31, 2005 versus March 31, 2006 by 9.0 million gallons or $10.8 million and the quantity of inventory at the beginning of fiscal 2006 was greater than the level at the beginning of fiscal 2005, which also reduced the cash requirement to finance inventory during the six months ended March 31, 2006. Cash flow from operating activities was positively impacted by increasing the monthly budget payments for those customers participating in our budget payment plan and the warmer temperatures which reduced consumption and resulted in $6.7 million more in cash received (net of deliveries) as of March 31, 2006 when compared to March 31, 2005.
Investing Activities
During the six months ended March 31, 2006, we spent $3.0 million for fixed assets and received $1.3 million from the sale of certain fixed assets. Cash flow provided by investing activities was $469.2 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005, primarily due to the sale of the propane segment in December 2004.
Financing Activities
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, cash flows used in financing activities were $7.9 million, as we borrowed $46.3 million under our revolving credit facility, repaid $52.9 million previously borrowed under this facility, repaid long-term debt of $0.7 million and spent $0.6 million to amend our bank facility. Cash flows used in financing activities were $179.7 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005. During the six months ended March 31, 2005, $292.2 million of cash was provided from borrowings under our new revolving credit facility, which was used to repay $119.0 million borrowed under our previous credit agreement and $48.1 million borrowed under the new agreement. Also, during the six months ended March 31, 2005, we repaid $259.5 million in long-term debt, paid $37.7 million in debt prepayment premiums and expenses and paid $7.7 million in fees and expenses related to refinancing our bank credit facilities.
As a result of the above activity, cash decreased by $90.0 million, to $9.2 million as of March 31, 2006.
Financing and Sources of Liquidity
We had $267.4 million of long-term debt outstanding as of March 31, 2006 which includes $265 million in 10 1/4% notes due 2013. The following summarizes our long-term debt maturities occurring over the next five years as of March 31, 2006:

 	  	(in millions)	 	
2006	  	$	0.1	 	
2007	  	$	—  	 	
2008	  	$	—  	 	
2009	  	$	—  	 	
2010	  	$	—  	 	
Thereafter	  	$	267.3	(a)	

(a)	As a result of the recapitalization of the Partnership, this amount was reduced by approximately $92.1 million subsequent to March 31, 2006. (See Recapitalization). The closing of the recapitalization was deemed to be a “change of control” under the existing indenture for the remaining $7.6 million in face amount of existing notes that were not repurchased, converted into common units or exchanged for new notes in connection with the recapitalization. Consequently, we are required to make an offer to repurchase such existing notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of their face value within 30 days following the closing of the recapitalization.	
On December 17, 2004, we entered into a $260 million asset based revolving credit facility with a group of lenders led by JP Morgan Chase Bank, which was amended in November 2005. The revolving credit facility provides us with the ability to borrow up to $260 million for working capital purposes (subject to certain
 
40

Table of Contents
borrowing base limitations and coverage ratios) including the issuance of up to $75 million in letters of credit. From December through March of each year, the heating oil segment can borrow up to $310.0 million. Obligations under the revolving credit facility are secured by liens on substantially all of the assets of the heating oil segment, including accounts receivable, inventory, general intangibles, real property, fixtures and equipment.
Under the terms of the revolving credit facility, we must maintain at all times either availability (borrowing base less amounts borrowed and letters of credit issued) of $25.0 million or a fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the credit agreement) of not less than 1.1 to 1.0. As of March 31, 2006, availability was $159.8 million and the fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the credit agreement) was 1.2 to 1.0. In April 2006, we completed our recapitalization of Star Gas Partners. As part of that recapitalization, we used approximately $18.8 million to repay debt and fund transaction expenses. As a result, availability as of March 31, 2006, on a pro-forma basis would have been $141.0 million. As of March 31, 2006, $54.4 million in letters of credit had been issued, primarily for current and future insurance reserves. For the balance of fiscal 2006, we expect to issue an additional $1.5 million in letters of credit in connection with our insurance program.
We enter into various hedging arrangements to manage the majority of our exposure to market risk related to changes in the current and future market price of home heating oil purchased for resale to our protected price customers. To a certain extent, availability must be set aside to respond to the volatile home heating oil markets. Futures contracts are marked to market on a daily basis and require an initial cash margin deposit and potentially require a daily adjustment to such cash deposit (maintenance margin). For example, assuming 100 million gallons, a 30-cent per gallon decline in the market value of these hedged instruments (as we experienced from September 2005 to October 2005) would create an additional cash margin requirement of approximately $30.0 million (while a 30 cent per gallon increase in market value would provide $30.0 million in available margin). In this example, availability in the short-term is reduced, as we fund the margin call. This availability reduction should be temporary, as we should be able to purchase product at a later date for 30 cents a gallon less than the anticipated strike price when the agreement with the price-protected customer was entered into. In addition, a spike in wholesale heating oil prices could also reduce availability, as we must finance a portion of our inventory and accounts receivable with internally generated cash as the net advance for eligible accounts receivable is 85% and 40% to 80% of eligible inventory. Availability includes our ability to borrow up to $35 million against fixed assets and customer lists, which is reduced by $7.0 million each year over the life of the agreement. As of March 31, 2006, the amount included in the borrowing base for fixed assets and customer lists was $28.0 million.
Prior to October 18, 2004, we were generally able to obtain trade credit from home heating oil suppliers of two to three business days. Since October 18, 2004, we must now prepay for our heating oil supply by at least two days. The loss of trade credit has reduced availability.
As of March 31, 2006, our accounts receivable balance net of allowances totaled $212.0 million (which excludes accounts receivable included in assets held for sale), and represents an increase of $122.3 million when compared to the balance as of September 30, 2005 of $89.7 million. Our ability to collect these receivables over the upcoming months will impact our borrowing base availability, as the borrowing base, which is used to measure availability, does not include accounts receivable over 60 days past due. At March 31, 2006, accounts receivable over 60 days past due were approximately $13.5 million compared to $10.8 million as of March 31, 2005, or an increase of $2.7 million. A component of accounts receivable at March 31, 2006 represent amounts due from customers under a budget payment plan, which permits a customer to pay for their annual consumption ratably over the year. As of March 31, 2006, the aggregate amount due from budget customers over 60 days past due whose billings exceeded their payments was $2.9 million, compared to $1.8 million at March 31, 2005. This increase of $1.1 million is due principally to the increase in the per-gallon selling price of home heating oil. In addition, we have $5.8 million of accounts receivable over 60 days past due at March 31, 2006 for certain commercial accounts, compared to $6.3 million at March 31, 2005.
For the majority of our fiscal year, the amount of cash received from customers with a budget payment plan is greater than actual billings. This amount is reflected on the balance sheet under the caption “customer credit
 
41

Table of Contents
balances.” At March 31, 2006, customer credit balances aggregated $26.1 million. Generally, customer credit balances are at their low point after the end of the heating season and peak prior to the beginning of the heating season. At March 31, 2005, customer credit balances were $20.5 million. During the non-heating season, cash is provided from customer credit balances to fund operating activities. If net receipts from budget customers are reduced, cash availability in the non-heating season would be reduced and we would need to borrow under the revolving credit facility to fund operations.
Before August 2007, we must implement certain changes to ensure compliance with amended Environmental Protection Agency regulations. We currently estimate that the capital required to effectuate these requirements will range from $1.0 to $1.5 million. Annual maintenance capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $3.5 million, excluding the capital requirements for environmental compliance.
There will be no mandatory distributions of available cash by us through the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008. Beginning October 1, 2008, minimum quarterly distributions will start accruing at the rate of $0.0675 per quarter ($0.27 on an annual basis). If the Partnership elects to commence making distributions of available cash before October 1, 2008, minimum quarterly distributions will begin to accrue at such earlier date. Thereafter, in general, we intend to distribute to our partners on a quarterly basis, all of our available cash, if any, in the manner described below. “Available cash” generally means, for any of our fiscal quarters, all cash on hand at the end of that quarter, less the amount of cash reserves that are necessary or appropriate in the reasonable discretion of the general partners to:
 
 	•	 	provide for the proper conduct of our business;	
 
 	•	 	comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments or other agreements; or	
 
 	•	 	provide funds for distributions to the common unitholders during the next four quarters, in some circumstances.	
Available cash will generally be distributed as follows:
 
 	•	 	first, 100% to the common units, pro rata, until we distribute to each common unit the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.0675;	
 
 	•	 	second, 100% to the common units, pro rata, until we distribute to each common unit any arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units for prior quarters;	
 
 	•	 	third, 100% to the general partner units, pro rata, until we distribute to each general partner unit the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.0675;	
 
 	•	 	fourth, 90% to the common units, pro rata, and 10% to the general partner units, pro rata, until we distribute to each common unit the first target distribution of $0.1125; and	
 
 	•	 	thereafter, 80% to the common units, pro rata, and 20% to the general partner units, pro rata.	
The revolving credit facility and the indenture for the new notes both impose certain restrictions on our ability to pay distributions to unitholders.
 
42

Table of Contents
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily through our bank credit facility due to the fact that we are subject to variable interest rates. We utilized these borrowings to meet our working capital needs and also to fund the short-term needs of our acquisition program.
At March 31, 2006, we did not have any outstanding borrowings under our bank credit facility.
We selectively uses derivative financial instruments to manage our exposure to market risk related to changes in the current and future market price of home heating oil. We do not hold derivatives for trading purposes. The value of market sensitive derivative instruments is subject to change as a result of movements in market prices. Consistent with the nature of hedging activity, associated unrealized gains and losses would be offset by corresponding decreases or increases in the purchase price, we would pay for the product being hedged. Sensitivity analysis is a technique used to evaluate the impact of hypothetical market value changes. Based on a hypothetical ten percent increase in the cost of product at March 31, 2006, the potential gain on our hedging activity would be to increase the fair value of these outstanding derivatives by $5.8 million to a fair value of $9.1 million; and conversely a hypothetical ten percent decrease in the cost of product would decrease the fair value of these outstanding derivatives by $5.6 million to a fair value of $(2.3) million.
Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
(a)	Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.	
The general partner’s principal executive officer and its principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Such disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership is accumulated and communicated to the appropriate management, including the principle executive and financial officers, on a basis that permits timely decisions regarding timely disclosure. Based on that evaluation, such principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report have been designed and are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
 
(b)	Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.	
No change in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
(c)	The general partner and the Partnership believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.	
 
43

Table of Contents
PART II    OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On or about October 21, 2004, a purported class action lawsuit on behalf of a purported class of unitholders was filed against the Partnership and various subsidiaries and officers and directors in the United States District Court of the District of Connecticut entitled  Carter v. Star Gas Partners, L.P. , et al,  No. 3:04-cv-01766-IBA, et al. Subsequently, 16 additional class action complaints, alleging the same or substantially similar claims, were filed in the same district court: (1)  Feit v. Star Gas, et al . Civil Action No. 04-1832 (filed on 10/29/2004), (2)  Lila Gold vs. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1791 (filed on 10/22/2004), (3)  Jagerman v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1855 (filed on 11/3/2004), (4)  McCole, et al v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1859 (filed on 11/3/2004), (5)  Prokop vs. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1785 (filed on 10/22/2004), (6)  Seigle v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1803 (filed on 10/25/2004), (7)  Strunk v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1815 (filed on 10/27/2004), (8)  Harriette S. & Charles L. Tabas Foundation vs. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1857 (filed on 11/3/2004), (9)  Weiss v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1807 (filed on 10/26/2004), (10)  White v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1837 (filed on 10/9/2004), (11)  Wood vs. Star Gas et al , Civil Action No. 04-1856 (filed on 11/3/2004), (12)  Yopp vs. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1865 (filed on 11/3/2004), (13)  Kiser v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1884 (filed on 11/9/2004), (14)  Lederman v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1873 (filed on 11/5/2004), (15)  Dinkes v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1979 (filed 11/22/2004) and (16)  Gould v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-2133 (filed on 12/17/2004) (including the Carter Complaint, collectively referred to herein as the “Class Action Complaints”). The class actions have been consolidated into one action entitled In re Star Gas Securities Litigation, No 3:04cv1766 (JBA).
The class action plaintiffs generally allege that the Partnership violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated hereunder, by purportedly failing to disclose, among other things: (1) problems with the restructuring of Star Gas’s dispatch system and customer attrition related thereto; (2) that Star Gas’ heating oil segment’s business process improvement program was not generating the benefits allegedly claimed; (3) that Star Gas was struggling to maintain its profit margins in its heating oil segment; (4) that Star Gas’s fiscal 2004 second quarter profit margins were not representative of its ability to pass on heating oil price increases; and (5) that Star Gas was facing an inability to pay its debts and that, as a result, its credit rating and ability to obtain future financing was in jeopardy. The class action plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of compensatory damages including interest against the defendants jointly and severally and an award of reasonable costs and expenses. On February 23, 2005, the Court consolidated the Class Action Complaints and heard argument on motions for the appointment of lead plaintiff. On April 8, 2005, the Court appointed the lead plaintiff. Pursuant to the Court’s order, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint on June 20, 2005 (the “Consolidated Amended Complaint”). The Consolidated Amended Complaint named: (a) Star Gas Partners, L.P.; (b) Star Gas LLC; (c) Irik Sevin; (d) Audrey Sevin; (e) Hanseatic Americas, Inc.; (f) Paul Biddelman; (g) Ami Trauber; (h) A.G. Edwards & Sons Inc.; (i) UBS Investment Bank; and (j) RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. as defendants. The Consolidated Amended Complaint added claims arising out of two registration statements and the same transactions under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as certain allegations concerning the Partnership’s hedging practices. On September 23, 2005, defendants filed motions to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim under the federal securities laws and failure to satisfy the applicable pleading requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 or PSLRA, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs filed their response to defendants’ motions to dismiss on or about November 23, 2005 and defendants filed their reply briefs on December 20, 2005. The motion is now pending decision by the Court. In the interim, discovery in the matter remains stayed pursuant to the mandatory stay provisions of the PSLRA. While no prediction may be made as to the outcome of litigation, we intend to defend against this class action vigorously.
In the event that the above action is decided adversely to us, it could have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity
 
44

Table of Contents
Item 1A.
RISK FACTORS
An investment in the Partnership involves a high degree of risk. Security holders and Investors should carefully review the following risk factors.
The continuation of high wholesale energy costs may adversely affect our liquidity.
Under our revolving credit facility, as amended, we may borrow up to $260 million, which increases to $310 million during the peak winter months from December through March of each year, (subject to borrowing base limitations and coverage ratio) for working capital purposes subject to maintaining availability (as defined in the credit agreement) of $25 million or a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.1 to 1.0.
Recent dynamics of the heating oil industry have adversely impacted working capital requirements, principally as follows:
 
 	•	 	High selling prices require additional borrowing to finance accounts receivable; however, we may borrow only approximately 85% against eligible accounts receivable and 40% to 80% of eligible inventory. In addition we may borrow up to $35 million against fixed assets and customer lists, which is reduced by $7.0 million each year over the life of the credit agreement. As of March 31, 2006, the amount included in the borrowing base for fixed assets and customer lists was $28.0 million.	
 
 	•	 	At present, suppliers are not providing credit terms to us, requiring us to pay in advance for product. Historically, we have enjoyed, on average, two-to three-day credit terms providing additional credit support during the heating season.	
 
 	•	 	Due to our current credit position, our ability to execute certain hedging strategies has been curtailed, which we anticipate will require us to purchase a greater proportion of New York Mercantile Exchange (“Nymex”) futures contracts to implement our hedging strategy than we have in the past. These contracts require an initial margin at the time of purchase and we are required to fund maintenance margins based on daily market adjustments should the market price of home heating oil decrease. The payment of these margins, if required, may be well in advance of settlement and will have an adverse impact on liquidity.	
 
 	•	 	In addition to the foregoing, there is a risk that accounts receivable collection experience may not equal that of prior periods since customers are owing larger amounts which could be outstanding for longer periods of time.	
If our credit requirements should exceed the amounts available under our revolving credit facility or should we fail to maintain the required availability, we would not have sufficient working capital to operate our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our substantial debt and other financial obligations could impair our financial condition and our ability to fulfill our debt obligations. (see Recapitalization)
On a pro-forma basis, after giving effect to the recapitalization and the offer to repurchase $7.6 million in notes under the change in control provision, we would have had total debt, exclusive of our working capital facility, of approximately $166.7 million as of March 31, 2006. Our substantial indebtedness and other financial obligations could:
 
 	•	 	impair our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or general corporate purposes;	
 
 	•	 	have a material adverse effect on us if we fail to comply with financial and affirmative and restrictive covenants in our debt agreements and an event of default occurs as a result of a failure that is not cured or waived;	
 
45

Table of Contents
 	•	 	require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow for interest payments on our indebtedness and other financial obligations, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital and capital expenditures;	
 
 	•	 	limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; and	
 
 	•	 	place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have proportionately less debt.	
If we are unable to meet our debt service obligations and other financial obligations, we could be forced to restructure or refinance our indebtedness and other financial transactions, seek additional equity capital or sell our assets. We may then be unable to obtain such financing or capital or sell our assets on satisfactory terms, if at all.
Since weather conditions may adversely affect the demand for home heating oil, our financial condition is vulnerable to warm winters.
Weather conditions have a significant impact on the demand for home heating oil because our customers depend on this product principally for space heating purposes. As a result, weather conditions may materially adversely impact our operating results and financial condition. During the peak heating season of October through March, sales of home heating oil historically have represented approximately 75% to 80% of our annual home heating oil volume. Actual weather conditions can vary substantially from year to year, significantly affecting our financial performance. Furthermore, warmer than normal temperatures in one or more regions in which we operate can significantly decrease the total volume we sell and the gross profit realized on those sales and, consequently, our results of operations. For example, in fiscal 2000 and especially fiscal 2002, temperatures were significantly warmer than normal for the areas in which we sell home heating oil, which adversely affected the amount of EBITDA that we generated during these periods. In fiscal 2002, temperatures in our areas of operation were an average of 18.4% warmer than in fiscal 2001 and 18.0% warmer than normal. We purchase weather insurance to help minimize the adverse effect of weather volatility on our cash flows. However, there can be no assurance that this insurance will be adequate to protect us from adverse effects of weather conditions.
Our operating results will be adversely affected if we experience significant customer losses that are not offset or reduced by customer gains.
Our net attrition rate of home heating oil customers for fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005 was approximately 1.5%, 6.4% and 7.1%, respectively. This rate represents the net of our annual customer loss rate after customer gains. For fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005, gross customer losses were 16.4%, 19.5% and 20%, respectively. For fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005, gross customer gains were 14.9%, 13.1% and 12.9%, respectively. The gain of a new customer does not fully compensate for the loss of an existing customer during the first year because of the expenses incurred to acquire a new customer and the higher attrition rate associated with new customers. Customer losses are the result of various factors, including:
 
 	•	 	supplier changes based primarily on price competition, particularly during periods of high energy costs;	
 
 	•	 	quality of service issues, including those related to our centralized call center;	
 
 	•	 	credit problems; and	
 
 	•	 	customer relocations.	
The continuing unprecedented rise and volatility in the price of heating oil has intensified price competition, which has adversely impacted our margins and added to our difficulty in reducing customer attrition. We believe our attrition rate has risen not only because of increased price competition related to the rise in oil prices but also because of operational problems. Prior to the 2004 winter heating season, we attempted to develop a competitive advantage in customer service and, as part of that effort, centralized a majority of our heating equipment service dispatch and engaged a centralized call center to fulfill telephone requirements for a majority of our home heating oil customers. We experienced difficulties in advancing this initiative during fiscal 2004, which adversely impacted our customer base and costs. In fiscal 2004 and 2005, the customer experience was below the level associated with other premium service providers and below the level of service provided by us in prior years.
 
46

Table of Contents
We believe that we have identified the problems associated with the centralization efforts and are taking steps to address these issues. We expect that high net attrition rates may continue through fiscal 2006 and perhaps beyond and even to the extent the rate of attrition can be halted, attrition from prior fiscal years will adversely impact net income in the future.
We believe that the increase in net customer attrition over the past two years can be attributed to: (i) a combination of the effect of our premium service/premium price strategy when customer price sensitivity increased due to high energy prices; (ii) our decision in fiscal 2005 to maintain reasonable profit margins going forward in spite of competitors’ aggressive pricing tactics; (iii) the lag effect of customer attrition related to service and delivery problems experienced by customers in prior fiscal years; (iv) continued customer dissatisfaction with the centralization of customer care; and (v) tightened customer credit standards.
We have continued to experience net customer attrition during fiscal 2006. If wholesale prices remain high, we believe the risk of customer losses due to credit problems, especially for commercial customers, may increase and bad debt expense may also increase.
We may not be able to achieve net gains of customers and may continue to experience net customer attrition in the future.
Sudden and sharp oil price increases that cannot be passed on to customers may adversely affect our operating results.
The retail home heating oil industry is a “margin-based” business in which gross profit depends on the excess of retail sales prices over supply costs. Consequently, our profitability is sensitive to changes in the wholesale price of home heating oil caused by changes in supply or other market conditions. These factors are beyond our control and thus, when there are sudden and sharp increases in the wholesale cost of home heating oil, we may not be able to pass on these increases to customers through increased retail sales prices. As of March 31, 2006, the wholesale cost of home heating oil, as measured by the closing price on the New York Mercantile Exchange (“Nymex”), had increased by 12.1% to $1.86 per gallon from $1.66 per gallon as of March 31, 2005. During fiscal 2005, per gallon wholesale home heating oil prices peaked at $2.18 on September 1, 2005. Wholesale price increases could reduce our gross profits and could, if continuing over an extended period of time, reduce demand by encouraging conservation or conversion to alternative energy sources. In an effort to retain existing accounts and attract new customers, we may offer discounts, which will impact the net per gallon gross margin realized.
A significant portion of our home heating oil volume is sold to price-protected customers and our gross margins could be adversely affected if we are not able to effectively hedge against fluctuations in the volume and cost of product sold to these customers.
A significant portion of our home heating oil volume is sold to individual customers under an agreement pre-establishing the maximum sales price or a fixed price of home heating oil over a 12-month period. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 and the six months ended March 31, 2006, approximately 48% and 39%, respectively, of our retail home heating oil volume sales were under a price-protected plan. The price at which home heating oil is sold to these price protected customers is generally renegotiated prior to the beginning of the heating season of each year based on current market conditions. We currently purchase futures contracts, swaps and option contracts for a substantial majority of the heating oil that we expect to sell to these price-protected customers that have agreements in place in advance and at a fixed or maximum cost per gallon. We purchase these positions when a price-protected customer renews his purchase commitment for the next 12 months. We utilize various hedging strategies in order to “lock in” the per gallon margin for price protected customers. The amount of home heating oil volume that we hedge per price-protected customer is based upon the estimated fuel consumption per customer, per month. In the event that the actual usage exceeds the amount of the hedged volume on a monthly basis, we could be required to obtain additional volume at unfavorable margins. In addition, should actual usage be less than the hedged volume we may have excess inventory on hand at unfavorable costs.
 
47

Table of Contents
If we do not make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, our future financial performance will be limited.
The home heating oil industry is not a growth industry because new housing generally does not use oil heat and increased competition exists from alternative energy sources. A significant portion of our growth in the past decade has been directly tied to our acquisition program. Accordingly, future financial performance will depend on our ability to make acquisitions at attractive prices. We cannot assure that we will be able to identify attractive acquisition candidates in the home heating oil industry in the future or that we will be able to acquire businesses on economically acceptable terms. Factors that may adversely affect home heating oil operating and financial results may limit our access to capital and adversely affect our ability to make acquisitions. Under the terms of our revolving credit facility, the heating oil segment was restricted from making any acquisitions through June 17, 2005 and thereafter individual acquisitions may not exceed $10 million or an aggregate of $25 million in any fiscal year. In addition, the heating oil segment is restricted from making any acquisition unless availability (essentially borrowing base availability less borrowings) would be at least $40 million, on a pro forma basis, during the last 12-month period ending on the date of such acquisition. These restrictions severely limit our ability to make acquisitions. Any acquisition may involve potential risks to us and ultimately to our unitholders, including:
 
 	•	 	an increase in our indebtedness;	
 
 	•	 	an increase in our working capital requirements;	
 
 	•	 	our inability to integrate the operations of the acquired business;	
 
 	•	 	our inability to successfully expand our operations into new territories;	
 
 	•	 	the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns; and	
 
 	•	 	an excess of customer loss or loss of key employees from the acquired business.	
In addition, acquisitions may be dilutive to earnings and distributions to unitholders and any additional debt incurred to finance acquisitions may among other things, affect our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.
Because of the highly competitive nature of the retail home heating oil industry, we may not be able to retain existing customers or acquire new customers, which would have an adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition.
If our home heating oil operations are unable to compete effectively, we may lose existing customers or fail to acquire new customers, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We compete with heating oil distributors offering a broad range of services and prices, from full service distributors, like us, to those offering delivery only. Competition with other companies in the home heating oil industry is based primarily on customer service and price. It is customary for companies to deliver home heating oil to their customers based upon weather conditions and historical consumption patterns, without the customer making an affirmative purchase decision. Most companies provide home heating equipment repair service on a 24-hour-per-day basis. In some cases, homeowners have formed buying cooperatives to purchase fuel oil from distributors at a price lower than individual customers are otherwise able to obtain. As a result of these factors, it may be difficult to acquire new customers.
We can make no assurances that we will be able to compete successfully. If competitors continue to increase market share by reducing their prices, as we believe occurred recently, our operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. We also compete for customers with suppliers of alternative energy products, principally natural gas. Competition from alternative energy sources has been increasing as a result of reduced regulation of many utilities, including natural gas and electricity, and the high price of oil. We could face additional price competition from electricity and natural gas as a result of deregulation in those industries. Over the past five years, conversions by our customers from heating oil to natural gas have averaged approximately 1% per year.
 
48

Table of Contents
The continuing unprecedented rise in the price of heating oil has intensified price competition, which has adversely impacted our product margins and added to our difficulty in reducing customer attrition. We believe our attrition rate has risen not only because of increased price competition related to the rise in oil prices, but also because of operational problems. Prior to the 2004 winter heating season, we attempted to develop a competitive advantage in customer service and, as part of that effort, centralized a majority of our heating equipment service dispatch and engaged a centralized call center to fulfill telephone requirements for the majority of our home heating oil customers. We experienced difficulties in advancing this initiative during fiscal 2004 and 2005, which adversely impacted our customer base and costs. In fiscal 2004 and 2005 the customer experience was below the level associated with other premium service providers and below the level of service provided by us in prior years.
We believe that we have identified the problems associated with these centralization efforts and are taking steps to address these issues We expect that high net attrition rates may continue through fiscal 2006 and perhaps beyond and even to the extent that the rate of attrition can be halted, attrition in prior fiscal years will adversely impact net income in the future.
Energy efficiency and new technology may reduce the demand for our products and adversely affect our operating results.
Increased conservation and technological advances, including installation of improved insulation and the development of more efficient furnaces and other heating devices, have adversely affected the demand for our products by retail customers. Future conservation measures or technological advances in heating, conservation, energy generation or other devices might reduce demand and adversely affect our operating results.
We are subject to operating and litigation risks that could adversely affect our operating results whether or not covered by insurance.
Our operations are subject to all operating hazards and risks normally incidental to handling, storing, transporting and otherwise providing customers with home heating oil. As a result, we may be a defendant in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business.
We maintain insurance policies with insurers in amounts and with coverage and deductibles as we believe are reasonable. However, there can be no assurance that this insurance will be adequate to protect us from all material expenses related to potential future claims for remediation costs and personal and property damage or that these levels of insurance will be available in the future at economical prices.
Our insurance reserves may not be adequate to cover actual losses.
We self-insure a portion of workers’ compensation, automobile and general liability claims. We establish reserves based upon expectations as to what our ultimate liability will be for these claims using developmental factors based upon historical claim experience. We periodically evaluate the potential for changes in loss estimates with the support of qualified actuaries. As of March 31, 2006, we had approximately $36.2 million of insurance reserves and had issued $43.6 million in letters of credit for current and future claims. The ultimate settlement of these claims could differ materially from the assumptions used to calculate the reserves, which could have a material effect on our results of operations.
We are the subject of a number of class action lawsuits alleging violation of the federal securities laws, which if decided adversely, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
On or about October 21, 2004, a purported class action lawsuit on behalf of a purported class of unitholders was filed against the Partnership and various subsidiaries and officers and directors in the United States District Court of the District of Connecticut entitled  Carter v. Star Gas Partners, L.P. , et al,  No. 3:04-cv-01766-IBA, et al. Subsequently, 16 additional class action complaints, alleging the same or substantially similar claims, were filed in the same district court: (1)  Feit v. Star Gas, et al.  Civil Action No. 04-1832 (filed on 10/29/2004),
 
49

Table of Contents
(2) Lila Gold vs. Star Gas, et al, Civil Action No. 04-1791 (filed on 10/22/2004), (3) Jagerman v. Star Gas, et al, Civil Action No. 04-1855 (filed on 11/3/2004), (4)  McCole, et al v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1859 (filed on 11/3/2004), (5)  Prokop vs. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1785 (filed on 10/22/2004), (6)  Seigle v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1803 (filed on 10/25/2004), (7)  Strunk v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1815 (filed on 10/27/2004), (8)  Harriette S. & Charles L. Tabas Foundation vs. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1857 (filed on 11/3/2004), (9)  Weiss v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1807 (filed on 10/26/2004), (10)  White v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1837 (filed on 10/9/2004), (11)  Wood vs. Star Gas et al , Civil Action No. 04-1856 (filed on 11/3/2004), (12)  Yopp vs. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1865 (filed on 11/3/2004), (13)  Kiser v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1884 (filed on 11/9/2004), (14)  Lederman v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1873 (filed on 11/5/2004), (15)  Dinkes v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-1979 (filed 11/22/2004) and (16)  Gould v. Star Gas, et al , Civil Action No. 04-2133 (filed on 12/17/2004) (including the Carter Complaint, collectively referred to herein as the “Class Action Complaints”). The class actions have been consolidated into one action entitled In re Star Gas Securities Litigation, No 3:04cv1766 (JBA).
The class action plaintiffs generally allege that the Partnership violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated hereunder, by purportedly failing to disclose, among other things: (1) problems with the restructuring of Star Gas’s dispatch system and customer attrition related thereto; (2) that Star Gas’ heating oil segment’s business process improvement program was not generating the benefits allegedly claimed; (3) that Star Gas was struggling to maintain its profit margins in its heating oil segment; (4) that Star Gas’s fiscal 2004 second quarter profit margins were not representative of its ability to pass on heating oil price increases; and (5) that Star Gas was facing an inability to pay its debts and that, as a result, its credit rating and ability to obtain future financing was in jeopardy. The class action plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of compensatory damages including interest against the defendants jointly and severally and an award of reasonable costs and expenses. On February 23, 2005, the Court consolidated the Class Action Complaints and heard argument on motions for the appointment of lead plaintiff. On April 8, 2005, the Court appointed the lead plaintiff. Pursuant to the Court’s order, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint on June 20, 2005 (the “Consolidated Amended Complaint”). The Consolidated Amended Complaint named: (a) Star Gas Partners, L.P.; (b) Star Gas LLC; (c) Irik Sevin; (d) Audrey Sevin; (e) Hanseatic Americas, Inc.; (f) Paul Biddelman; (g) Ami Trauber; (h) A.G. Edwards & Sons Inc.; (i) UBS Investment Bank; and (j) RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. as defendants. The Consolidated Amended Complaint added claims arising out of two registration statements and the same transactions under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as certain allegations concerning the Partnership’s hedging practices. On September 23, 2005, defendants filed motions to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim under the federal securities laws and failure to satisfy the applicable pleading requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 or PSLRA, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs filed their response to defendants’ motions to dismiss on or about November 23, 2005 and defendants filed their reply briefs on December 20, 2005. The motion is now pending decision by the Court. In the interim, discovery in the matter remains stayed pursuant to the mandatory stay provisions of the PSLRA. While no prediction may be made as to the outcome of litigation, we intend to defend against this class action vigorously.
In the event that the above action is decided adversely to us, it could have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by governmental regulation and associated environmental and regulatory costs.
The home heating oil business is subject to a wide range of federal and state laws and regulations related to environmental and other regulated matters. We have implemented environmental programs and policies designed to avoid potential liability and costs under applicable environmental laws. It is possible, however, that we will experience increased costs due to stricter pollution control requirements or liabilities resulting from noncompliance with operating or other regulatory permits. New environmental regulations might adversely
 
50

Table of Contents
impact operations, including underground storage and transportation of home heating oil. In addition, there are environmental risks inherently associated with home heating oil operations, such as the risks of accidental releases or spill. It is possible that material costs and liabilities will be incurred, including those relating to claims for damages to property and persons. Before August 2006, we must implement certain changes to ensure compliance with amended Environmental Protection Agency regulations. We currently estimate that the capital required to effectuate these requirements will range from $1.0 to $1.5 million.
In our acquisition of Meenan, we assumed all of Meenan’s environmental liabilities.
In our acquisition of Meenan Oil Co. L.P., or “Meenan,” in August 2001, we assumed all of Meenan’s environmental liabilities, including those related to the cleanup of contaminated properties, in consideration of a reduction of the purchase price of $2.7 million. Subsequent to closing, we established an additional reserve of $2.3 million to cover potential costs associated with remediating known environmental liabilities, bringing the total reserve to $5.0 million. To date, remediation expenses against this reserve have totaled $[3.3] million. While we believe this reserve is adequate, it is possible that the extent of the contamination at issue or the expense of addressing it could exceed our estimates and thus the costs of remediating these known liabilities could materially exceed the amount reserved.
Conflicts of interest have arisen and could arise in the future as a result of relationships between the general partner and its affiliates on the one hand, and the Partnership and its limited partners, on the other hand.
Conflicts of interest have arisen and could arise in the future as a result of relationships between the general partner and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Partnership or any of the limited partners, on the other hand. As a result of these conflicts the general partner may favor its own interests and those of its affiliates over the interests of the unitholders. The nature of these conflicts is ongoing and includes the following considerations:
 
 	•	 	The general partner’s affiliates are not prohibited from engaging in other business or activities, including direct competition with us.	
 
 	•	 	The general partner determines the amount and timing of asset purchases and sales, capital expenditures, borrowings and reserves, each of which can impact the amount of cash, if any, available for distribution to unitholders, and available to pay principal and interest on debt.	
 
 	•	 	The general partner controls the enforcement of obligations owed to the Partnership by the general partner.	
 
 	•	 	The general partner decides whether to retain separate counsel, or others to perform services for the Partnership.	
 
 	•	 	In some instances the general partner may borrow funds in order to permit the payment of distributions to unitholders.	
 
 	•	 	The general partner may limit its liability and reduce its fiduciary duties, while also restricting the remedies available to unitholders for actions that might, without limitations, constitute breaches of fiduciary duty. Unitholders are deemed to have consented to some actions and conflicts of interest that might otherwise be deemed a breach of fiduciary or other duties under applicable state law.	
 
 	•	 	The general partner is allowed to take into account the interests of parties in addition to the Partnership in resolving conflicts of interest, thereby limiting its fiduciary duty to the unitholders.	
 
 	•	 	The general partner determines whether to issue additional units or other securities of the Partnership.	
 
 	•	 	The general partner determines which costs are reimbursable by us.	
 
 	•	 	Some officers of the general partner, who provide services to us, may also devote significant time to the businesses of the general partner’s affiliates and will be compensated by these affiliates for the services	
 
51

Table of Contents
 	rendered to them. Paul Vermylen, who, effective April 28, 2006 is Chairman of Kestrel Heat (the successor general partner—see Recapitalization), serves as President of Kestrel Energy Partners. Kestrel Energy Partners is a private equity partnership that makes investments in energy-related projects.	
 
 	•	 	The general partner is not restricted from causing us to pay the general partner or its affiliates for any services rendered on terms that are fair and reasonable to us or entering into additional contractual arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf.	
The risk of global terrorism and political unrest may adversely affect the economy and the price and availability of home heating oil and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Terrorist attacks, such as the attacks that occurred in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001, and political unrest in the Middle East may adversely impact the price and availability of home heating oil, our results of operations, our ability to raise capital and our future growth. The impact that the foregoing may have on the heating oil industry in general, and on our business in particular, is not known at this time. An act of terror could result in disruptions of crude oil supplies and markets, the source of home heating oil, and its facilities could be direct or indirect targets. Terrorist activity may also hinder our ability to transport home heating oil if our normal means of transportation become damaged as a result of an attack. Instability in the financial markets as a result of terrorism could also affect our ability to raise capital. Terrorist activity could likely lead to increased volatility in prices for home heating oil. Insurance carriers are routinely excluding coverage for terrorist activities from their normal policies, but are required to offer such coverage as a result of new federal legislation. We have opted to purchase this coverage with respect to our property and casualty insurance programs. This additional coverage has resulted in additional insurance premiums.
The impact of hurricanes and other natural disasters could cause disruptions in supply and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Hurricanes, particularly in the Gulf of Mexico, and other natural disasters may cause disruptions in the supply chains for home heating oil and other petroleum products. Disruptions in supply could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, causing an increase in wholesale prices and decrease in supply.
Cash distributions (if any) are not guaranteed and may fluctuate with performance and reserve requirements.
There will be no mandatory distributions of available cash by us through the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008. Thereafter distributions on the common units are dependent on the amount of cash generated, distributions may fluctuate based on our performance. The actual amount of cash that is available will depend upon numerous factors, including:
 
 	•	 	profitability of operations;	
 
 	•	 	required principal and interest payments on debt;	
 
 	•	 	debt covenants;	
 
 	•	 	margin account requirements;	
 
 	•	 	cost of acquisitions;	
 
 	•	 	issuance of debt and equity securities;	
 
 	•	 	fluctuations in working capital;	
 
 	•	 	capital expenditures;	
 
52

Table of Contents
 	•	 	adjustments in reserves;	
 
 	•	 	prevailing economic conditions;	
 
 	•	 	financial, business and other factors; and	
 
 	•	 	increased pension funding requirements;	
Most of these factors are beyond the control of the general partner.
The partnership agreement gives the general partner discretion in establishing reserves for the proper conduct of our business. These reserves will also affect the amount of cash available for distribution.
The revolving credit facility and the indenture for the new notes both impose certain restrictions on our ability to pay distributions to unitholders. See Recapitalization.
 
53

Table of Contents
Item 6.
EXHIBITS
Exhibits Included Within:

  3.1	  	Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership.	
 	 	
31.1	  	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification.	
 	 	
31.2	  	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification.	
 	 	
31.3	  	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification.	
 	 	
31.4	  	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification.	
 	 	
32.1	  	Section 906 Certification.	
 	 	
32.2	  	Section 906 Certification.	
 
54

Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf of the undersigned thereunto duly authorized:
Star Gas Partners, L.P.
(Registrant)
By: Kestrel Heat LLC, as General Partner

Signature	  	Title	 	Date	
/S/    RICHARD F. AMBURY        
Richard F. Ambury	  	Chief Financial Officer
Kestrel Heat LLC
(Principal Financial Officer)	 	May 9, 2006	
Star Gas Finance Company
(Registrant)

Signature	  	Title	 	Date	
/S/    RICHARD F. AMBURY        
Richard F. Ambury	  	Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)	 	May 9, 2006	
 
55

Exhibit 3.1
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.
 
Star Gas Partners, L.P., a limited partnership organized under the Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Act (the “Act”), for purposes of amending and restating its Certificate of Limited Partnership filed with the office of the Secretary of State of Delaware on October 16, 1995 under the name Star Gas Partners L.P. and amended on October 19, 1995 changing its name to Star Gas Partners, L.P., hereby certifies that effective upon filing its Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:
1. The name of the limited partnership is Star Gas Partners, L.P.
2. The address of the registered office of the limited partnership in Delaware is 615 South Dupont Hwy., Dover, DE 19901. The limited partnership’s registered agent at that address is Capital Services, Inc.
3. The name and address of the general partner is as follows:

Name	  	Address	
 	 	
Kestrel Heat, LLC            	  	2187 Atlantic Street	
 	  	Stamford, CT 06902	
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership; which restates and integrates and also further amends the Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership as heretofore amended or supplemented, has been duly executed as of the 28th day of April, 2006 and is being filed in accordance with Section 17-210 of the Act by the withdrawing general partner thereunto duly authorized and by the general partner designated herein as the new general partner.

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
STAR GAS LLC	  	KESTREL HEAT, LLC	
The withdrawing general partner	  	The new general partner	
 	 	 	 	
By:	  	/s/ Joseph Cavanaugh                	  	By:	  	/s/ Joseph Cavanaugh                	
Name:	  	Joseph Cavanaugh	  	Name:	  	Joseph Cavanaugh	
Title:	  	Chief Executive Officer	  	Title:	  	Chief Executive Officer	

Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Joseph P. Cavanaugh, certify that:
 
 	1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (“Registrant”).	
 
 	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;	
 
 	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;	
 
 	4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:	
 
 	(a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;	
 
 	(b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;	
 
 	(c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and	
 
 	(d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and	
 
 	5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:	
 
 	(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and;	
 
 	(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.	
Date: May 9, 2006

 	
/s/    JOSEPH P. CAVANAUGH        	
Joseph P. Cavanaugh	
Chief Executive Officer	
Star Gas Partners, L.P.	

Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Joseph P. Cavanaugh, certify that:
 
 	1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Star Gas Finance Company (“Registrant”).	
 
 	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;	
 
 	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;	
 
 	4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:	
 
 	(a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;	
 
 	(b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;	
 
 	(c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and	
 
 	(d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and	
 
 	5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:	
 
 	(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and;	
 
 	(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.	
Date: May 9, 2006

 	
/s/    JOSEPH P. CAVANAUGH        	
Joseph P. Cavanaugh	
Chief Executive Officer	
Star Gas Finance Company	

Exhibit 31.3
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Richard F. Ambury, certify that:
 
 	1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (“Registrant”).	
 
 	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;	
 
 	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;	
 
 	4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:	
 
 	(a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;	
 
 	(b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;	
 
 	(c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and	
 
 	(d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and	
 
 	5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:	
 
 	(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and;	
 
 	(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.	
Date: May 9, 2006

 	
/s/    RICHARD F. AMBURY        	
Richard F. Ambury	
Chief Financial Officer	
Star Gas Partners, L.P.	

Exhibit 31.4
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Richard F. Ambury, certify that:
 
 	1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Star Gas Finance Company (“Registrant”).	
 
 	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;	
 
 	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;	
 
 	4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:	
 
 	(a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;	
 
 	(b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;	
 
 	(c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and	
 
 	(d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and	
 
 	5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:	
 
 	(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and;	
 
 	(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.	
Date: May 9, 2006

 	
/s/    RICHARD F. AMBURY        	
Richard F. Ambury	
Chief Financial Officer	
Star Gas Finance Company	

Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) and Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph P. Cavanaugh, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:
 
 	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and	
 
 	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.	
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.
STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY
By: KESTREL HEAT, LLC (General Partner)

 	 	 	 	
May 9, 2006	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/    JOSEPH P. CAVANAUGH        	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Joseph P. Cavanaugh	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Chief Executive Officer	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Star Gas Partners, L.P.	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Star Gas Finance Company	

Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) and Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard F. Ambury, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:
 
 	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and	
 
 	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.	
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.
STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY
By: KESTREL HEAT, LLC (General Partner)

 	 	 	 	
May 9, 2006	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/    RICHARD F. AMBURY        	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Richard F. Ambury	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Chief Financial Officer	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Star Gas Partners, L.P.	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Star Gas Finance Company